{"id":"W2333229178","doi":"","title":"UNE APPROCHE RÉGIONALE À LA BIOSÉCURITÉ : L'EXEMPLE AVICOLE A REGIONAL APPROACH TO BIOSECURITY: THE POULTRY EXAMPLE","year":2009,"lang":"fr","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Animal Disease Management and Epidemiology","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Political science; Humanities; Biosecurity; Forestry; Geography; Philosophy; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003638603,0.0007801236,0.0005653056,0.001156411,0.00169117,0.004059534,0.001697363,0.002934529,0.006642264],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003590931,0.0003957424,0.001724062,0.001861373,0.002032136,0.002874143,0.002849902,0.001941541,0.00174944],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002447131,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002571806,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04180445,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05554378,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9969428,0.001967099,0.00009357205,0.0002921625,0.0004632822,0.000241113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9974016,0.001047309,0.0001561591,0.0004006061,0.0007957527,0.000198614],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003075622,0.0002213702,0.01249464,0.001327987,0.0002078284,0.003655869,0.005755989,0.08408728,0.008947319,0.6451656,0.03562123,0.2022073],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009448698,0.0003669925,0.006280891,0.0005862677,0.0002283864,0.002457533,0.006122996,0.06891733,0.003243007,0.1022703,0.8092977,0.0001341316],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04265973,0.0152982,0.6926928,0.03885518,0.001059832,0.000389339,0.0006481193,0.0009349434,0.2074618],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4374996,0.01444248,0.4770855,0.003272909,0.0005454497,0.0003753133,0.0007223823,0.0003720153,0.06568442],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.04180445,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08312225,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.05597958616173876,"score_gpt":0.2599427152293285,"score_spread":0.2039631290675898,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}