{"id":"W2333336945","doi":"10.1037/a0038392","title":"Superset versus substitution-letter priming: An evaluation of open-bigram models.","year":2014,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Experimental Psychology Human Perception & Performance","topic":"Visual and Cognitive Learning Processes","field":"Psychology","cited_by":20,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Bigram; Priming (agriculture); Computer science; Prime (order theory); Orthographic projection; Arithmetic; Natural language processing; Set (abstract data type); Speech recognition; Artificial intelligence; Mathematics; Programming language; Combinatorics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001679347,0.0002227828,0.0003654263,0.0002703424,0.0002541624,0.00005608351,0.0006253642,0.0001795778,0.004189121],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00002611896,0.0002037461,0.000115161,0.0001617676,0.0003402061,0.001246644,0.0000610051,0.000402188,0.0001136829],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001042467,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004778691,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00001885348,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000005371361,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9976,0.0005037916,0.0007182547,0.0003567936,0.0005425522,0.0002786058],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983182,0.00003193016,0.000594033,0.000326592,0.000611525,0.0001177112],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.01372017,0.01082932,0.01982986,0.0001001104,0.0006916589,0.00001418077,0.05835652,0.002357522,0.7485423,0.01094808,0.01519679,0.1194135],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.05935749,0.04377708,0.8052865,0.0005759411,0.00093067,0.0008048563,0.02733785,0.01316816,0.0285864,0.002792452,0.01525778,0.002124777],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9752243,0.0002127371,0.0005179775,0.0001252535,0.00137393,0.0002288623,0.000002435482,0.00001880482,0.02229566],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9979563,0.00002069703,0.0003771682,0.0008268424,0.0005626823,0.0000389709,0.00003245596,0.00002674455,0.0001581718],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7854567,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9967212,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.2490963234838949,"score_gpt":0.4948971492684628,"score_spread":0.2458008257845679,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}