{"id":"W2333568743","doi":"10.1016/j.jfds.2016.03.001","title":"Auto insurance fraud detection using unsupervised spectral ranking for anomaly","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Journal of Finance and Data Science","topic":"Anomaly Detection Techniques and Applications","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":113,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Ranking (information retrieval); Pattern recognition (psychology); Anomaly detection; Computer science; Spectral clustering; Data mining; Outlier; Laplacian matrix; Rank (graph theory); Artificial intelligence; Categorical variable; Similarity (geometry); Ranking SVM; Mathematics; Machine learning; Cluster analysis; Graph; Theoretical computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002453348,0.0008135762,0.001311066,0.003563061,0.0007218465,0.00144001,0.001290674,0.0009169106,0.001137518],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008142428,0.0002973684,0.001022867,0.002132326,0.0008401814,0.001909567,0.001235171,0.001426127,0.0008329786],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007475833,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0009966091,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001500776,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002098494,"domain_scores_codex":[0.99741,0.001049618,0.0001488752,0.0003762473,0.0008198736,0.0001955023],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9946933,0.002390836,0.0008596661,0.0008136792,0.001041701,0.0002007374],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002755333,0.0006549983,0.01158421,0.0001758018,0.0002092447,0.0002278703,0.0002465322,0.2763279,0.02178056,0.03095084,0.005909448,0.651657],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000006119718,0.00004363249,0.0009123666,0.00000503792,0.00000668286,0.00007256366,0.00002635928,0.9836721,0.002127835,0.01255054,0.0005595239,0.00001722591],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.0443184,0.0001508736,0.953326,0.0001760897,0.00003095822,0.00006240602,0.00009761986,0.0008835862,0.0009540871],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.65315,0.0001407503,0.3437066,0.000106213,0.0001084352,0.0001281917,0.000566192,0.0001345173,0.001959102],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.003563061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01297468,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04567491940861173,"score_gpt":0.3052709651566672,"score_spread":0.2595960457480554,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}