{"id":"W2333668943","doi":"10.1103/physrevx.3.041011","title":"Experimental Demonstration of Active Electromagnetic Cloaking","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review X","topic":"Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":161,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Cloak; Cloaking; Invisibility; Realization (probability); Electromagnetic field; Microwave; Metamaterial; Field (mathematics); Electromagnetic radiation; Physics; Metamaterial cloaking; Computer science; Transformation optics; Optics; Tunable metamaterials; Telecommunications; Quantum mechanics; Metamaterial absorber","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006913807,0.0005641774,0.0002846319,0.0002762999,0.0007333663,0.0008818889,0.0008354675,0.001484548,0.006690436],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001157253,0.0003332076,0.0001596927,0.0003404678,0.001054981,0.0008660631,0.0008536328,0.001119014,0.001604718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004544636,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003366951,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0006244982,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006819454,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9993351,0.00008374917,0.00003104694,0.0001425849,0.0002652611,0.000142113],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.998893,0.0004311284,0.0001454947,0.0002122914,0.0002077068,0.0001105108],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003258237,0.0001198995,0.0001750223,0.0001143375,0.000007973273,0.0003404767,0.0001735578,0.000292511,0.9868076,0.006503455,0.001307663,0.00383157],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00008644258,0.0002822886,0.0003250303,0.00001225044,0.000006152839,0.0001468608,0.00007182873,0.001880082,0.9855461,0.0007296453,0.01089296,0.0000202725],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8230461,0.001421072,0.05025878,0.00165511,0.0007685674,0.0003085147,0.00130819,0.001934374,0.1192993],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9769856,0.0003503831,0.01433107,0.0001682642,0.00003630067,0.00009852059,0.0003300472,0.00009699715,0.00760287],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.006690436,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02238178,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02090364621233305,"score_gpt":0.3185351937931702,"score_spread":0.2976315475808372,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}