{"id":"W2333739070","doi":"10.1139/cjp-2013-0073","title":"Space–time diagram approach in derivation of Lienard–Wiechert potential for a moving point charge","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Physics","topic":"Quantum and Classical Electrodynamics","field":"Physics and Astronomy","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Physics; Point particle; Scalar potential; Scalar (mathematics); Vector potential; Point (geometry); Classical mechanics; Magnetic monopole; Magnetic potential; Charge (physics); Electric charge; Quantum electrodynamics; Electric potential; Magnetic field; Quantum mechanics; Geometry; Voltage","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003323089,0.0004735804,0.0004823515,0.001097488,0.0005937631,0.0007580839,0.001008746,0.0008399588,0.005651955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00089886,0.0002176936,0.0007504409,0.0008096012,0.0008274344,0.001803507,0.0007344874,0.001318871,0.001824064],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004890775,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0007371152,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00156518,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.001464337,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998043,0.00005350586,0.00001187122,0.00002777948,0.00008791256,0.00001455227],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9998422,0.00004035537,0.00002032035,0.00001511786,0.00006559113,0.00001656213],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007615937,0.000007997844,0.000107841,0.00008250572,0.000007441316,0.000253229,0.0001048497,0.0149117,0.00373058,0.9728879,0.001233237,0.006665098],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001633784,0.00004043489,0.0002496514,0.00005485113,0.00001413771,0.0004465555,0.0000512673,0.1379851,0.002580934,0.8253283,0.03319868,0.00003364366],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01393179,0.00185175,0.9431521,0.0007374969,0.0006750126,0.00004948391,0.00015048,0.0002575213,0.03919443],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.4575229,0.005693349,0.4888737,0.000983666,0.0007353754,0.0003032986,0.0004284897,0.0009609492,0.04449828],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.005651955,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01890767,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.005721773100344193,"score_gpt":0.1946098067777942,"score_spread":0.18888803367745,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}