{"id":"W2333751236","doi":"10.1016/s0735-1097(16)31834-4","title":"SYSTEMATIC REVIEW AND META-ANALYSIS EVALUATING THE DIAGNOSTIC ACCURACY OF CARDIAC MAGNETIC RESONANCE IMAGING TO ASSESS LEFT ATRIAL APPENDAGE THROMBI","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of the American College of Cardiology","topic":"Cardiac tumors and thrombi","field":"Medicine","cited_by":2,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Magnetic resonance imaging; Appendage; Cardiac magnetic resonance; Radiology; Cardiac magnetic resonance imaging; Modality (human–computer interaction); Cardiac imaging; Cardiology; Thrombus; Internal medicine; Artificial intelligence; Anatomy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01745222,0.003342642,0.01957462,0.005246797,0.0009883586,0.003290207,0.002390705,0.003060171,0.002840657],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06569144,0.001927868,0.05079355,0.005596563,0.001279181,0.002106565,0.001768055,0.002741753,0.0004081847],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002019797,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002652762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008355708,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01518324,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9825909,0.008361704,0.004790446,0.002435323,0.001367203,0.0004545206],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9434831,0.04564409,0.005857621,0.002230617,0.002313876,0.0004707116],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"meta_analysis","study_design_gemma":"meta_analysis","study_design_scores_codex":[0.003299995,0.00002235468,0.00711951,0.05256251,0.9329762,0.00008751102,0.00004524642,0.0002680287,0.0001569617,0.0000410718,0.0002148596,0.003205656],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006691452,0.0001309943,0.002516458,0.001639007,0.9945037,0.00004150945,0.00001425676,0.0001070216,0.00004879627,0.0000649414,0.0002506776,0.00001347078],"study_design_candidate":"meta_analysis","study_design_consensus":"meta_analysis","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.02827357,0.9678506,0.00149392,0.0003125162,0.0005034896,0.0003178609,0.0008112546,0.00005170875,0.0003850205],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6297823,0.3604602,0.004137803,0.001905028,0.0008497293,0.000889824,0.00138941,0.00007256993,0.0005131494],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.01957462,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.09229732,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04057405371723371,"score_gpt":0.3530449810594012,"score_spread":0.3124709273421675,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}