{"id":"W2334054527","doi":"10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.30","title":"Getting through Ethics: The Fit between Research Ethics Board Assessments and Qualitative Research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Transparency (behavior); Qualitative research; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Engineering ethics; Research integrity; Process (computing); Sociology; Management science; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","open_science","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch","sts","research_integrity"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8367128,0.0007940638,0.002100669,0.005676185,0.01634953,0.001946408,0.005732969,0.008557879,0.0006078781],"category_scores_gemma":[0.8220482,0.0005390682,0.0007581485,0.009977859,0.03527782,0.001442571,0.007448869,0.4007403,0.0007564873],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004385521,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.03263694,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001964725,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0008818228,"domain_scores_codex":[0.5140932,0.3241661,0.006169425,0.003094364,0.1392179,0.01325914],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.07174219,0.8248321,0.0007011835,0.003720625,0.09413058,0.004873302],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.005166895,0.005009643,0.03194728,0.006382814,0.001589945,0.001147395,0.3885454,0.000009509975,0.003813711,0.4443351,0.1085663,0.003486005],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003642949,0.01958213,0.0312073,0.008183813,0.00008229279,0.000121524,0.1741683,0.00004600808,0.002244185,0.6209009,0.1391245,0.0006960731],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4691946,0.004808294,0.0002025065,0.4900354,0.0004104442,0.003361514,0.00005221113,0.00006599284,0.03186911],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9561153,0.01965379,0.003506001,0.003331002,0.006881744,0.0002482634,0.00001847129,0.0003209733,0.009924427],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.500666,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997061,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9881145546035123,"score_gpt":0.8642491724530705,"score_spread":0.1238653821504417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}