{"id":"W2334054527","doi":"10.1525/jer.2012.7.5.30","title":"Getting through Ethics: The Fit between Research Ethics Board Assessments and Qualitative Research","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Empirical Research on Human Research Ethics","topic":"Ethics in Clinical Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":31,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of New Brunswick","funders":"","keywords":"Research ethics; Transparency (behavior); Qualitative research; Reciprocity (cultural anthropology); Engineering ethics; Research integrity; Process (computing); Sociology; Management science; Psychology; Political science; Computer science; Social science; Engineering; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.6534371,0.001188433,0.002565795,0.01025072,0.013654,0.03751081,0.004989407,0.008050031,0.002882917],"category_scores_gemma":[0.6945259,0.002275954,0.001247459,0.008512813,0.09323183,0.04547329,0.03003144,0.01325728,0.001096083],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01998071,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.05135679,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004854429,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006703317,"domain_scores_codex":[0.1383966,0.8122308,0.01864359,0.006641292,0.02175913,0.002328539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.1619955,0.7319399,0.02351648,0.03618689,0.0395326,0.006828723],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":"methods","study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009164084,0.00007932048,0.004918339,0.002341506,0.00007459092,0.0003622045,0.4871876,0.0004460355,0.0004496791,0.4120576,0.004297773,0.08769365],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009458236,0.0002177493,0.003504293,0.009845491,0.00007001094,0.00136167,0.2648974,0.003577607,0.0006543089,0.6165372,0.09899261,0.0002469613],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04388836,0.01109346,0.6872267,0.1785817,0.004118973,0.004908535,0.0001274279,0.0003955217,0.06965946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6015804,0.003682451,0.3630762,0.0149781,0.0006990987,0.01303993,0.00007837187,0.0004286233,0.002436842],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.3465629,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4273738,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.9881145546035123,"score_gpt":0.8642491724530705,"score_spread":0.1238653821504417,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}