{"id":"W2334211255","doi":"10.5235/108546812801228149","title":"The Incoherence of Judicial Review in Canada","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Judicial Review","topic":"Judicial and Constitutional Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Judicial review; Political science; Judicial opinion; Judicial activism; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0154317,0.000274974,0.0008387459,0.00417064,0.03000285,0.01191606,0.002522575,0.004251318,0.00583397],"category_scores_gemma":[0.06998363,0.0007937911,0.0004759874,0.009885357,0.01293424,0.00321906,0.004593447,0.00826261,0.0003303842],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.2498551,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.470551,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9955691,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9982648,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9636312,0.004070682,0.001168398,0.001834323,0.01935128,0.009944106],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9231031,0.02049414,0.004928655,0.001115642,0.03997406,0.01038437],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001590909,0.00005798614,0.03002122,0.0004485653,0.0001392761,0.0007451162,0.01789788,0.001686111,0.0003837876,0.5903961,0.2735827,0.08448212],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002250434,0.0001093872,0.2220024,0.001757688,0.0003030752,0.0003545391,0.01918826,0.003982635,0.001144744,0.08711526,0.6633521,0.0004649039],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1404408,0.0642982,0.003089977,0.5621472,0.001848216,0.0002124993,0.001732481,0.0001339398,0.2260967],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9286272,0.01471877,0.001380993,0.02961969,0.0004686479,0.00007144762,0.0001918178,0.00007354442,0.02484794],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.2498551,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8700618,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03762319479688505,"score_gpt":0.3273233739651873,"score_spread":0.2897001791683023,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}