{"id":"W2334538937","doi":"10.1103/physreva.85.053842","title":"Effective-medium approach to planar multilayer hyperbolic metamaterials: Strengths and limitations","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Physical Review A","topic":"Metamaterials and Metasurfaces Applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":260,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Metamaterial; Isotropy; Planar; Dielectric; Optics; Scattering; Homogeneous; Anisotropy; Physics; Materials science; Boundary (topology); Computational physics; Optoelectronics; Mathematical analysis; Mathematics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005903252,0.0007538016,0.0004581952,0.0008313361,0.0002900096,0.001013631,0.0012496,0.0005413371,0.0008807241],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001255353,0.0002826179,0.0004172752,0.0004970353,0.0009192791,0.00169426,0.0007904386,0.0009027158,0.0004039403],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006806539,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002943517,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004377256,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0005580322,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9997762,0.00007419084,0.00001285643,0.00002945928,0.00008387255,0.00002336518],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996567,0.0001519555,0.0000386675,0.00008954558,0.00004769638,0.00001558304],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003301019,0.00003806943,0.0003014771,0.000372309,0.00003980233,0.0003067934,0.0001051998,0.07602729,0.03815781,0.8498933,0.0006898643,0.03403493],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001765507,0.00008064007,0.0002822176,0.00007627629,0.00003810846,0.0004586749,0.00006767327,0.6837351,0.02041968,0.2803034,0.01447343,0.00004725487],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.04094837,0.007464716,0.9217616,0.000645256,0.0001700199,0.00003574509,0.0000819433,0.0002828377,0.0286094],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.7076871,0.009874638,0.2750915,0.0001849702,0.0001654042,0.000125552,0.00007555621,0.00009593047,0.006699329],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.0012496,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.004938543,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04645995217014411,"score_gpt":0.3394921167019309,"score_spread":0.2930321645317868,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}