{"id":"W2334579767","doi":"10.4257/826","title":"A MONITORING TECHNIQUE FOR HIGH-ALTITUDE HEADWATER STREAMS: A CASE STUDY IN THE HIGH ANDES","year":2013,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Oecologia Australis","topic":"Water-Energy-Food Nexus Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Lakehead University","funders":"","keywords":"STREAMS; Effects of high altitude on humans; Altitude (triangle); Ecology; Physical geography; Environmental science; Hydrology (agriculture); Geography; Geology; Biology; Computer science; Meteorology; Computer network; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000357107,0.0002306962,0.0002343695,0.00005015299,0.0002512014,0.0000724271,0.0003643308,0.000106574,0.0006369792],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003402306,0.0001441475,0.00004499979,0.0001824487,0.0001479936,0.0002673988,0.0002454601,0.0001542469,0.00007815818],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002249197,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000005683451,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.05341983,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01297818,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9984502,0.0001423393,0.0002769181,0.0004103443,0.0002007526,0.0005194416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9993352,0.000188863,0.00006848219,0.0003406962,0.00001357691,0.00005317237],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004377541,0.002056791,0.9515359,0.00003382162,0.0001250739,0.002061751,0.005370331,0.000517575,0.02548433,0.0004932498,0.008364805,0.003912621],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001236657,0.001804358,0.9333926,0.00002073272,0.00006393408,0.0002605996,0.01416795,0.00001190737,0.03958637,0.008826701,0.0001367364,0.0004914784],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9965591,0.000005459606,0.00004950914,0.0006649354,0.00012817,0.001872527,0.00001757254,0.00005611832,0.0006465946],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9933918,0.000001839868,0.001843878,0.00007469504,0.00007087945,0.004252209,0.000003156578,0.00001723755,0.0003443052],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04044165,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9528835,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03291362581394608,"score_gpt":0.2804205455103147,"score_spread":0.2475069196963686,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}