{"id":"W2335831909","doi":"10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.047","title":"Optimal aggregate size distribution for the formation of highly efficient nanosheet dynamic membranes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Membrane Science","topic":"Membrane Separation Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Membrane; Nanosheet; Chemical engineering; Materials science; Filtration (mathematics); Porosity; Turbidity; Particle size; Aggregate (composite); Substrate (aquarium); Particle (ecology); Nanotechnology; Chemistry; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002419023,0.0001423043,0.0002299216,0.00007118771,0.0003205582,0.00004806897,0.001122344,0.00006135822,0.0001407404],"category_scores_gemma":[0.001895241,0.00007107253,0.0001379785,0.0007122248,0.001441242,0.0009104887,0.0001568583,0.00009807227,0.00002478537],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002776469,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008418889,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000007396028,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000006696514,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977134,0.00004316459,0.0006722515,0.0002094719,0.001024598,0.0003370579],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977601,0.0007112146,0.0009327969,0.0003451259,0.000166287,0.00008445824],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001132965,0.00004866347,0.00003408744,0.00002535603,0.000005730059,0.000001370727,0.0001602071,0.02641966,0.96275,0.0002517601,0.0002078041,0.009982057],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0008289424,0.0002643625,0.002122378,0.00008326178,0.00003123787,0.0000958508,0.00021699,0.02654315,0.9674727,0.0002177575,0.001998458,0.0001248845],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9516277,0.0001067268,0.04373872,0.003615831,0.0003735941,0.0003375701,0.00003034141,0.00002519752,0.0001443024],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9971269,0.0002228052,0.002419488,0.00003436893,0.00002175203,0.000008974603,7.19263e-7,0.000006759569,0.0001582011],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04549922,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5310316,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008597016049802625,"score_gpt":0.2442479947752813,"score_spread":0.2356509787254787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}