{"id":"W2335831909","doi":"10.1016/j.memsci.2016.04.047","title":"Optimal aggregate size distribution for the formation of highly efficient nanosheet dynamic membranes","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Membrane Science","topic":"Membrane Separation Technologies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Ottawa","keywords":"Membrane; Nanosheet; Chemical engineering; Materials science; Filtration (mathematics); Porosity; Turbidity; Particle size; Aggregate (composite); Substrate (aquarium); Particle (ecology); Nanotechnology; Chemistry; Composite material","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0003471664,0.0002237916,0.0002593431,0.0002994496,0.0002739647,0.0004744358,0.0002172878,0.0003314985,0.0008668086],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005972298,0.0001974117,0.0001357478,0.000238306,0.0001808702,0.0006241014,0.0003291875,0.0003341737,0.0002924761],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005297791,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002702546,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002134862,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0007515824,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9998299,0.00002079567,0.00001633186,0.00005430902,0.00004610553,0.00003255157],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9997875,0.00007714471,0.00004721467,0.00001732274,0.00004749721,0.00002329674],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009744383,0.00005200484,0.000182148,0.00004335932,0.000004928556,0.00002236754,0.00002565801,0.003271465,0.990455,0.001115073,0.0001331472,0.004597426],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001176305,0.00006594324,0.000291244,0.000002476566,0.000004440148,0.00001524272,0.0000133945,0.01354498,0.9851319,0.000213308,0.0006994853,0.000005795813],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9680759,0.0005886029,0.02928562,0.0001193639,0.0000260094,0.0000276964,0.00008970055,0.0001038049,0.001683409],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937258,0.0001980622,0.005499961,0.00001588668,0.000006340957,0.0000211832,0.00003988004,0.00002116959,0.000471612],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.0008668086,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.003843844,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008597016049802625,"score_gpt":0.2442479947752813,"score_spread":0.2356509787254787,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}