{"id":"W2336053980","doi":"","title":"«Ministerium Justitiae». Jurisprudence of the Supreme Tribunal of the Apostolic Signatura [RECENSIÓN]","year":2012,"lang":"es","type":"article","venue":"Deposito Adademico Digital Universidad De Navarra (University of Navarra)","topic":"Theology and Canon Law Studies","field":"Arts and Humanities","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Jurisprudence; Law; Tribunal; Supreme court; Political science","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002568877,0.0004486014,0.0007845684,0.0001898925,0.001075772,0.00007241949,0.001794306,0.0004546831,0.0002530887],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00009201522,0.0003805402,0.0007830788,0.000369203,0.004027892,0.001204447,0.001059469,0.0007265445,0.00001734363],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002037268,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003580478,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0005727946,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001374636,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9974733,0.0002958819,0.0004682289,0.0003786356,0.0006450856,0.0007388759],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971707,0.0003823042,0.001044332,0.0007351065,0.0004722057,0.0001953133],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.002993899,0.001787639,0.237791,0.001864925,0.003000779,0.00008672749,0.09955415,0.0001069613,0.0325037,0.6029569,0.0133929,0.00396039],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.006749989,0.001219905,0.3965702,0.003500686,0.004856985,0.0005059118,0.1708271,0.0001450462,0.04327075,0.0012411,0.3685532,0.002559172],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9619088,0.002173068,0.00009496911,0.001142633,0.001075876,0.0004185653,0.001109463,0.00003712161,0.03203953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.993431,0.000212019,0.00003162514,0.0001032002,0.000180533,2.885157e-7,0.00001537804,0.00002832507,0.005997599],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6017158,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998646,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01136576129244546,"score_gpt":0.2027142769948509,"score_spread":0.1913485157024054,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}