{"id":"W2336308352","doi":"10.1002/hyp.10870","title":"Intercomparison of soil pore water extraction methods for stable isotope analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrological Processes","topic":"Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Office of Energy Efficiency; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Extraction (chemistry); Soil water; Water extraction; Environmental chemistry; Soil test; Chemistry; Isotope analysis; Water content; Environmental science; Stable isotope ratio; Chromatography; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Soil science; Geology; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004275696,0.00012341,0.000304984,0.00006782965,0.00007388091,0.00002802769,0.0001986525,0.0001041773,0.003306101],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000152639,0.00005516588,0.0001107915,0.0002173632,0.00009599834,0.0002293688,0.0000158015,0.00005740087,0.00002376762],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000003055577,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001830843,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001936357,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0002079946,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9989782,0.00005743252,0.0002750698,0.0002934427,0.0001022313,0.0002936117],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9992892,0.0003045504,0.00007941528,0.0001432594,0.0001123758,0.00007126131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0009908585,0.0002777957,0.6952921,0.0007179528,0.0006319867,0.000007937807,0.0004555597,0.003967242,0.0976393,0.00002270222,0.0007416575,0.199255],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006203032,0.0006227748,0.02959303,0.00002805946,0.0004207556,0.00001487728,0.0001156124,0.009336401,0.9133995,0.01119371,0.0342618,0.0003932442],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8456663,0.0004021841,0.1504328,0.0003585588,0.00007354926,0.0001405302,0.00004285786,0.00004709992,0.002836192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9937314,0.00004675262,0.005254571,0.00006646432,0.00004802494,0.000008430181,0.0001653543,0.000002206235,0.0006767497],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.8157601,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.997605,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03128409108523585,"score_gpt":0.304029252093044,"score_spread":0.2727451610078082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}