{"id":"W2336308352","doi":"10.1002/hyp.10870","title":"Intercomparison of soil pore water extraction methods for stable isotope analysis","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Hydrological Processes","topic":"Groundwater and Isotope Geochemistry","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":165,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Global Institute for Water Security; University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Office of Energy Efficiency; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; U.S. Forest Service; Office of Energy Efficiency and Renewable Energy; U.S. Department of Energy","keywords":"Extraction (chemistry); Soil water; Water extraction; Environmental chemistry; Soil test; Chemistry; Isotope analysis; Water content; Environmental science; Stable isotope ratio; Chromatography; Analytical Chemistry (journal); Soil science; Geology; Geotechnical engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004985576,0.0009223652,0.0006096227,0.001306693,0.0005436087,0.001184858,0.001153614,0.000971946,0.0007364879],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007598408,0.0004471897,0.0009138594,0.000940774,0.0006237502,0.0006054432,0.001096228,0.0006433853,0.0005510057],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000529176,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005413727,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002081626,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003996955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9930842,0.001506923,0.0007282974,0.001736469,0.002693714,0.0002503327],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9964587,0.0009641893,0.0003574037,0.0006227818,0.001519423,0.00007745993],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0005463749,0.0001302645,0.01222194,0.0004062164,0.0004321559,0.00005863075,0.0004600605,0.001268615,0.9498959,0.0002412137,0.0004774661,0.03386122],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004115123,0.0008529054,0.07376154,0.0001011784,0.0004118183,0.0001901511,0.0003345616,0.005833549,0.9068415,0.0005385336,0.01101257,0.00008052709],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8507358,0.003973387,0.1358181,0.0002302968,0.0004885482,0.001043248,0.003063161,0.0008530823,0.003794407],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8221388,0.002294252,0.1663741,0.0003314818,0.00008068448,0.001483707,0.004590142,0.0004122684,0.002294539],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.004985576,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02636653,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03128409108523585,"score_gpt":0.304029252093044,"score_spread":0.2727451610078082,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}