{"id":"W2336529691","doi":"10.1111/ecin.12344","title":"INTEGRATING MARKET ALTERNATIVES INTO THE ECONOMIC THEORY OF OPTIMAL DETERRENCE","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Inquiry","topic":"Law, Economics, and Judicial Systems","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Waterloo","funders":"","keywords":"Sanctions; Economics; Deterrence (psychology); Set (abstract data type); Function (biology); Microeconomics; Deterrence theory; Maximization; Face (sociological concept); Law and economics; Political science; Computer science; Law; Sociology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.002422859,0.0002721115,0.0007741514,0.0002097817,0.0001874398,0.00009664302,0.0009434666,0.0001500853,0.00267609],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001485285,0.000240497,0.000298449,0.00003973158,0.0009826372,0.0006632895,0.0002314463,0.0001429702,0.002129704],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008070976,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001113055,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009926979,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003623465,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9970981,0.0001013353,0.001594046,0.0007224638,0.00002368064,0.0004604078],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9972289,0.0006115381,0.001251883,0.0007815564,0.00001787025,0.0001083042],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001122526,0.00002729088,0.03262432,0.00002202507,0.0002630856,0.000001654351,0.007951465,0.0002222784,0.0001069078,0.9398503,0.005255839,0.01356261],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.003043056,0.0004165227,0.01761252,0.0002722953,0.00003806,0.00003142328,0.006388111,0.007913643,0.004327702,0.8675696,0.09058251,0.001804547],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8954101,0.001232647,0.009425616,0.0007467829,0.007894218,0.0004170986,0.0001727238,0.00006002737,0.08464081],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9954308,0.0004627251,0.000421391,0.0001790986,0.001915479,0.00006290282,0.000004142876,0.00005257339,0.001470846],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1000208,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9986473,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03664326103578679,"score_gpt":0.2465113949051027,"score_spread":0.2098681338693159,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}