{"id":"W2337382490","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.03.007","title":"Ecological monetary economics: A post-Keynesian critique","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Economic Theory and Policy","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Nexus (standard); Post-Keynesian economics; Monetary policy; Interest rate; Keynesian economics; Endogenous money; Debt; Monetary economics; Ecological economics; New Keynesian economics; Monetarism; Macroeconomics; Ecology; Sustainability","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaepi_narrow","insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.001243711,0.0005481464,0.001224634,0.0003104702,0.0002765316,0.0001494247,0.0009536553,0.0007049587,0.01445401],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0005502317,0.0004823609,0.0005448246,0.00009871156,0.0004469671,0.0008021726,0.0003287792,0.0003337667,0.01395162],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006360274,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00008990712,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001045503,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003889589,"domain_scores_codex":[0.995698,0.00009498704,0.001736175,0.001345645,0.00001018447,0.001115032],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9971169,0.0007944879,0.0006976646,0.0008507072,0.0000384698,0.0005017748],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001011539,0.0003344807,0.01563988,0.00001070019,0.0001057594,0.00001496255,0.00008416166,0.0001338293,0.00002754588,0.9779021,0.001226815,0.004418573],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001654128,0.0005557699,0.0963143,0.00001003155,0.00001210318,0.00005757482,0.00007172583,0.0004323175,0.0001136906,0.7447305,0.1550314,0.001016451],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9062046,0.0002929349,0.0002953126,0.01217738,0.001114111,0.0004459395,0.0008959261,0.0002123215,0.07836148],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.983656,0.001911864,0.0009384534,0.008293712,0.00075753,0.0001463751,0.00003869084,0.0000725931,0.004184799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2331717,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9997628,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02238594591117234,"score_gpt":0.2187039078306176,"score_spread":0.1963179619194452,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}