{"id":"W2337467981","doi":"10.60082/2817-5069.1466","title":"Searching for Smith: The Constitutionality of Mandatory Sentences","year":2001,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Osgoode Hall law journal","topic":"Criminal Law and Evidence","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Constitutionality; Supreme court; Law; Jurisprudence; Punishment (psychology); Parliament; Punitive damages; Proportionality (law); Political science; Constitutional review; Constitution; Psychology; Social psychology; Politics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01302691,0.0003229681,0.0007379213,0.001752176,0.01012053,0.009206424,0.003093377,0.006238222,0.003143681],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04019547,0.0008845039,0.0004328486,0.001235943,0.01594143,0.005540653,0.003143956,0.008361142,0.000373458],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02003574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04592464,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.4215326,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.6300144,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9868335,0.0031626,0.0008666557,0.00162802,0.004602534,0.002906652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9748716,0.01739432,0.002024874,0.0008248632,0.003933808,0.0009504798],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002956435,0.00001222879,0.0008273685,0.00007289609,0.000007929624,0.0002316879,0.003667987,0.000138369,0.0005174995,0.9747716,0.005696003,0.01402695],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001165751,0.0002575615,0.0227924,0.001647574,0.0002385706,0.0006988773,0.008742405,0.002657791,0.007528652,0.6372476,0.3177467,0.000325391],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.2331988,0.02102889,0.01835652,0.1333855,0.001324971,0.0002081666,0.0003994938,0.0002631626,0.5918345],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9682529,0.001988283,0.00315157,0.01074988,0.0002730021,0.0000648589,0.00005157468,0.00004036917,0.01542759],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.4215326,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.838158,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09996215917625473,"score_gpt":0.391120778265037,"score_spread":0.2911586190887823,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}