{"id":"W2337704952","doi":"10.1111/eva.12384","title":"Genetic consequences of selection cutting on sugar maple (<i>Acer saccharum</i>Marshall)","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Evolutionary Applications","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université du Québec en Abitibi-Témiscamingue","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; Genetic diversity; Selection (genetic algorithm); Inbreeding; Maple; Saccharum; Species richness; Genetic erosion; Genetic gain; Genetic variation; Ecology; Botany; Population; Demography; Genetics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"category_scores_codex":[0.00008112899,0.00008759145,0.00007051277,0.00005184164,0.0001653652,0.000005308654,0.0001805304,0.00003812607,0.006026921],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000015336,0.00006892149,0.00003998437,0.0002925505,0.0002749232,0.0001120548,0.00006986871,0.00003971147,0.003800839],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001255307,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001436049,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002219529,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00002778169,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992006,0.00003170549,0.000177055,0.0002298146,0.0001884159,0.0001723955],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995667,0.00007194584,0.00009483291,0.0002062031,0.00001169289,0.0000486001],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00004675083,0.0004129782,0.537406,0.00003137443,0.00005162281,0.000001099665,0.0001385335,0.003295603,0.148159,0.1120182,0.148456,0.04998286],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0003500027,0.0001233027,0.5411043,0.0000292936,0.00002806031,0.0000111402,0.00001369598,0.0008221675,0.003259109,0.01942764,0.4345494,0.0002819881],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7757093,0.0002159537,0.01593617,0.008012397,0.000139638,0.001733127,0.0001208129,0.0002874804,0.1978451],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9885106,0.00005853031,0.003288316,0.0001417232,0.00008345241,0.0002176895,0.000006412218,0.00000941376,0.007683838],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2860933,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9969748,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.009894820167685527,"score_gpt":0.2315595833589507,"score_spread":0.2216647631912652,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}