{"id":"W2337952466","doi":"10.1080/09640568.2015.1116980","title":"Analysis of uncertainty consideration in environmental assessment: an empirical study of Canadian EA practice","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management","topic":"Environmental and Social Impact Assessments","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":41,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan; Concordia University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Terminology; Consistency (knowledge bases); Uncertainty analysis; Environmental impact assessment; Environmental resource management; Risk analysis (engineering); Computer science; Environmental planning; Environmental science; Management science; Business; Engineering; Political science; Simulation","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05305694,0.0003994211,0.0005373299,0.005627588,0.01149589,0.007971186,0.003382002,0.001745502,0.003525435],"category_scores_gemma":[0.2411619,0.0005453359,0.0006704573,0.01098942,0.00835696,0.004264752,0.005575426,0.003077736,0.0001888338],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09078493,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.1290381,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9145766,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9362121,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9376447,0.02172638,0.003395899,0.002699736,0.03082374,0.003709577],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.6562827,0.2350567,0.02405893,0.008220064,0.07017162,0.006209986],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003195118,0.000297527,0.2681456,0.00177701,0.0002934398,0.00196179,0.4119668,0.007461614,0.001417261,0.04569454,0.01234077,0.2483242],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005154649,0.0001873495,0.3203568,0.002632128,0.0001987547,0.0006766485,0.5169768,0.01387243,0.001072128,0.01467369,0.1288859,0.0004158101],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9185147,0.002665,0.006072999,0.01171021,0.00006002662,0.0004224375,0.0003054139,0.00006302277,0.06018632],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9947318,0.001140267,0.002243289,0.0004847484,0.000009140099,0.00005294898,0.00007868344,0.0000199053,0.001239276],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9092151,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6586939,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02306187202554529,"score_gpt":0.3287643475212458,"score_spread":0.3057024754957006,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}