{"id":"W2338100904","doi":"10.17645/si.v4i2.504","title":"Living Together v. Living Well Together: A Normative Examination of the SAS Case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Inclusion","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Normative; Sociology; Oppression; Law; Mantra; Sincerity; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001856885,0.0000970055,0.0001246959,0.00006084918,0.002534671,0.00002802513,0.0002496241,0.0001608225,0.0002772359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0007972327,0.0000601605,0.0001133315,0.0002853817,0.0003731976,0.0003007557,0.0006475947,0.00007565125,0.00002586313],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000269124,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001057924,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01193993,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0196138,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9979563,0.0009150022,0.0002288868,0.0001502587,0.000531849,0.0002176845],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987174,0.0006529915,0.0002474426,0.0001226945,0.0002161423,0.00004328206],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000007784108,0.0001287643,0.003803961,0.00002248042,0.00001528537,0.000007350945,0.8016039,0.000001363334,0.008036967,0.0471277,0.001301702,0.1379427],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002187027,0.0004349846,0.1980641,0.003111279,0.0003746914,0.00005982963,0.573943,0.0003526328,0.01130795,0.179893,0.02818432,0.002087139],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8056101,0.00007947391,0.0005911266,0.001687534,0.0004169085,0.0002892771,0.000005701811,0.00004944588,0.1912704],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9966992,0.00005947968,0.00004780158,0.0001232024,0.0003747239,0.00001009696,3.421576e-7,0.00001193276,0.002673257],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2276609,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9987639,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01970681895293581,"score_gpt":0.293381878033851,"score_spread":0.2736750590809152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}