{"id":"W2338100904","doi":"10.17645/si.v4i2.504","title":"Living Together v. Living Well Together: A Normative Examination of the SAS Case","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Social Inclusion","topic":"Religious Freedom and Discrimination","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Framing (construction); Normative; Sociology; Oppression; Law; Mantra; Sincerity; Law and economics; Political science; Politics; Theology; Philosophy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01434213,0.0005612947,0.0007328637,0.002237921,0.01759,0.01444187,0.001942823,0.01196007,0.004463911],"category_scores_gemma":[0.02189322,0.0004785084,0.001006221,0.002036048,0.03399285,0.00870036,0.007242559,0.01248247,0.0005780609],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01687329,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01310644,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1062098,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.107691,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9847451,0.007702508,0.000514294,0.00136405,0.003004163,0.002669891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9860548,0.01014793,0.0006058992,0.0005388296,0.001958959,0.0006935317],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000006744696,0.00001098391,0.0003164337,0.000006607256,0.000002117618,0.0002574121,0.007164122,0.00009731411,0.00005857885,0.9903494,0.0009950255,0.000735334],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00007329576,0.00008211727,0.002123394,0.0004298225,0.00003534482,0.0006187354,0.07194257,0.003104497,0.000763936,0.7690244,0.1516967,0.0001051228],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"other","genre_gemma":"other","genre_scores_codex":[0.1498749,0.001340501,0.006522701,0.06915741,0.0003289531,0.0001791865,0.0000968471,0.00005031924,0.7724493],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9642017,0.0005108585,0.00103725,0.0137731,0.0001904589,0.00029359,0.00004856375,0.00002885565,0.01991566],"genre_candidate":"other","genre_consensus":"other","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1062098,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2111832,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01970681895293581,"score_gpt":0.293381878033851,"score_spread":0.2736750590809152,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}