{"id":"W2339001487","doi":"10.1080/13504622.2015.1135418","title":"Environmental and sustainability education policy research: a systematic review of methodological and thematic trends","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"review","venue":"Environmental Education Research","topic":"Environmental Education and Sustainability","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":188,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Sustainability; Environmental education; Education policy; Policy analysis; Content analysis; Political science; Empirical research; Regional science; Thematic analysis; Educational research; Qualitative research; Sociology; Environmental resource management; Social science; Higher education; Public administration; Pedagogy; Ecology; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.04510966,0.00153139,0.00516372,0.03931429,0.0016445,0.005500667,0.002025033,0.002669551,0.003674107],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1290602,0.001563469,0.003976163,0.04784847,0.002155798,0.007053652,0.00334233,0.00209078,0.0006868718],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.008489585,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.04756832,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01002636,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03228354,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9672604,0.01335729,0.0110211,0.001999374,0.005562836,0.0007989915],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8571978,0.1095259,0.01238047,0.002345431,0.01757478,0.0009756693],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"systematic_review","study_design_gemma":"systematic_review","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001047984,0.00004552801,0.001862032,0.7289482,0.001774919,0.0002436768,0.0024486,0.0002944538,0.0004618166,0.004291438,0.00823027,0.2512943],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004031433,0.00009068252,0.003663852,0.8801994,0.005535596,0.0003611096,0.002712058,0.0001113726,0.0003010684,0.002104563,0.1048366,0.00004353256],"study_design_candidate":"systematic_review","study_design_consensus":"systematic_review","genre_codex":"review","genre_gemma":"review","genre_scores_codex":[0.0007396904,0.9963929,0.0004927753,0.001178294,0.0002453606,0.0001686141,0.0002175409,0.000007522562,0.0005573243],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006011117,0.9911212,0.001535799,0.0006044894,0.00009185491,0.0003478276,0.0001786686,0.000006952367,0.0001020514],"genre_candidate":"review","genre_consensus":"review","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9548904,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2385655,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1661691572033848,"score_gpt":0.5258266869831502,"score_spread":0.3596575297797653,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}