{"id":"W2339108397","doi":"10.1111/jvs.12408","title":"The impact of non‐reproductive plant species on assessments of community structure and species co‐occurrence patterns","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Algoma University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Biology; Species evenness; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Reproductive success; Plant community; Community structure; Relative species abundance; Reproductive isolation; Species diversity; Population; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003920869,0.0005710715,0.0004981463,0.001043273,0.0007277986,0.0009634872,0.0007274419,0.0003010446,0.001107085],"category_scores_gemma":[0.008392326,0.000319657,0.0005456866,0.0006303101,0.0008363297,0.000871122,0.001216728,0.0004079107,0.0001471789],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0008265505,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0006083196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01359505,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05849245,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9953649,0.002044846,0.0002292739,0.0006409961,0.001418162,0.0003018331],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9864298,0.006701299,0.002679808,0.001330612,0.001846444,0.001012049],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004634339,0.00008983048,0.9143712,0.0002532426,0.0004746099,0.0001332317,0.0007632358,0.001657955,0.06473069,0.0002005074,0.0001746637,0.01668746],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000003935584,0.0001536441,0.9916112,0.00001495086,0.00005215575,0.00006010744,0.0001890139,0.002871857,0.004639707,0.00009490042,0.0002990003,0.000009656625],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9962112,0.0001996589,0.002400277,0.00002304425,0.000004397757,0.00002213413,0.000260093,0.00001651347,0.0008626245],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981273,0.00003994513,0.001465544,0.00001860453,0.000002685143,0.00002029254,0.0001790818,0.000005032536,0.0001414931],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01359505,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02703184,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03000490037369128,"score_gpt":0.336610495248322,"score_spread":0.3066055948746307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}