{"id":"W2339108397","doi":"10.1111/jvs.12408","title":"The impact of non‐reproductive plant species on assessments of community structure and species co‐occurrence patterns","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Vegetation Science","topic":"Ecology and Vegetation Dynamics Studies","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":11,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Queen's University; Algoma University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Species richness; Biology; Species evenness; Ecology; Abundance (ecology); Reproductive success; Plant community; Community structure; Relative species abundance; Reproductive isolation; Species diversity; Population; Demography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001242039,0.00008158068,0.0001624582,0.00007755065,0.000370757,0.00001965459,0.0003628347,0.00002140253,0.00003948493],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004235536,0.0000390977,0.00004585294,0.0002097517,0.001792371,0.0004557081,0.00009401065,0.0001523647,0.000001299288],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001193221,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00005671535,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002046481,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006432226,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9988791,0.0001187774,0.0003305819,0.00009548318,0.000447476,0.0001285718],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9983595,0.0005559552,0.0007260904,0.0001718661,0.0001423152,0.00004428747],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00005923216,0.00007866718,0.8608061,0.000008372681,0.00002985864,7.843592e-7,0.002674831,0.001259231,0.1323401,0.0002677072,0.0001146343,0.002360397],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002179864,0.0005303849,0.9786797,0.00004445851,0.000007344553,0.00001206218,0.0005313485,0.0001248745,0.01857832,0.001221074,0.00000807557,0.00004437687],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9979839,0.00001494835,0.0007244034,0.000182922,0.0001396621,0.00006773406,0.00008333966,0.000001242216,0.0008018192],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9996734,0.0001067782,0.0001475313,0.00001339357,0.00001352275,5.639837e-7,7.138667e-7,0.000001525271,0.0000425582],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1178736,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6604065,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03000490037369128,"score_gpt":0.336610495248322,"score_spread":0.3066055948746307,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}