{"id":"W2339786590","doi":"10.1016/j.envsci.2016.04.005","title":"Considering agro-ecosystems as ecological funds for collective design: New perspectives for environmental policy","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Environmental Science & Policy","topic":"Agriculture and Rural Development Research","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":27,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"AgreenSkills; Institut National de la Recherche Agronomique","keywords":"Sustainability; General partnership; Collective action; Business; Process (computing); Ecosystem services; Environmental resource management; Democratization; Agriculture; Environmental planning; Environmental economics; Economics; Ecosystem; Ecology; Political science; Computer science; Environmental science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005095298,0.0003055457,0.0002744412,0.00008378504,0.001240212,0.0001350017,0.0006167058,0.0001411233,0.0009292135],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003137943,0.0001042898,0.0001847268,0.0005036431,0.000838313,0.0004653249,0.0002882978,0.00008759936,0.0002300325],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001894008,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003024499,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003007197,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00006700571,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9971606,0.00006950628,0.0002898959,0.0008333779,0.0005587292,0.001087923],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986366,0.0006067453,0.0001237944,0.00009275736,0.00001362563,0.000526464],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00009971882,0.0001843369,0.001520967,0.000002213926,0.00001992876,0.000001953556,0.0005644228,0.000004042511,0.9319729,0.002262953,0.003520183,0.05984638],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002784212,0.005242393,0.5435007,0.00006644293,0.00003381839,0.0001492647,0.01399589,0.00009665267,0.2637295,0.01824225,0.1505175,0.001641397],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.973294,0.00019401,0.0004993863,0.02071863,0.0001166192,0.002559266,0.000252449,0.00008105305,0.002284601],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9755562,0.0002167107,0.0008025901,0.0003323921,0.001079901,0.0002777328,0.00002119957,0.000003579513,0.0217097],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6682434,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9999841,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02856040351831178,"score_gpt":0.2665810152219472,"score_spread":0.2380206117036354,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}