{"id":"W2339999129","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.1.230","title":"Case Commentary: <i>R. v Walsh</i> and the “Myth” of Marital Rape","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Mythology; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Plaintiff; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; History; Philosophy; Theology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.002016982,0.00007874807,0.0002760465,0.0000516955,0.0005827746,0.0000747057,0.0001590985,0.00003671636,0.00006864485],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000172798,0.00003900028,0.00005275364,0.0001073004,0.001654069,0.0001614926,0.00002599702,0.0001003938,9.571223e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001004341,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001500724,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.01925726,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.08407167,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9990202,0.0002995245,0.0002457608,0.00007105398,0.000107358,0.0002561358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986057,0.0007191227,0.0001917968,0.00008602286,0.0001112581,0.0002860517],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000350649,0.00001890406,0.007469061,0.00002145051,0.0003638495,0.0003071553,0.2406436,0.000001982832,0.000004452199,0.725889,0.01571848,0.009211454],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01344933,0.0002415736,0.0008681102,0.0001555392,0.0001611116,0.001635386,0.1757211,0.00001890416,0.00001829129,0.1516028,0.6558036,0.0003243338],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6693521,0.001987874,0.00003840483,0.3124842,0.0004172558,0.0002277981,0.00004785987,0.000004590487,0.01543994],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9900549,0.0005606907,0.0000210492,0.008010424,0.0001914927,0.000004338508,3.057398e-7,0.000005950175,0.001150814],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6400851,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9872736,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02778402045500947,"score_gpt":0.2688105540889784,"score_spread":0.2410265336339689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}