{"id":"W2339999129","doi":"10.3138/cjwl.28.1.230","title":"Case Commentary: <i>R. v Walsh</i> and the “Myth” of Marital Rape","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Women and the Law/Revue Femmes et Droit","topic":"Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":1,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Appeal; Supreme court; Law; Mythology; Context (archaeology); Meaning (existential); Plaintiff; Political science; Sociology; Psychology; History; Philosophy; Theology","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.006131585,0.0006761434,0.001285933,0.001398245,0.01627804,0.004519348,0.00509016,0.05337171,0.005367103],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0364349,0.0005941043,0.001062916,0.001728805,0.01158522,0.003897029,0.003166409,0.03540528,0.001358785],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.01185126,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01773484,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1468945,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1728661,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9906664,0.004236379,0.0006349628,0.001178227,0.001898924,0.001385005],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9853212,0.01106238,0.0008981286,0.0002901181,0.001419339,0.001008805],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002930897,0.00001599977,0.0003769415,0.0003001376,0.0000125857,0.006057707,0.01622179,0.00008002436,0.0002075345,0.05353734,0.9172661,0.005894558],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000266293,0.0000342668,0.001068357,0.001993696,0.00003746473,0.005553973,0.02696824,0.0001629361,0.0002732005,0.01042917,0.9533612,0.00009093244],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"commentary","genre_scores_codex":[0.002404582,0.004683866,0.000145117,0.960777,0.01458249,0.00003106275,0.00004202017,0.00001485616,0.01731899],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.04970036,0.005431455,0.0002419803,0.9181579,0.0139953,0.00008918903,0.00002075776,0.00003372593,0.01232936],"genre_candidate":"commentary","genre_consensus":"commentary","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1468945,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2920789,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02778402045500947,"score_gpt":0.2688105540889784,"score_spread":0.2410265336339689,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}