{"id":"W2340890786","doi":"10.3171/2016.1.jns151545","title":"Clinical utility of a screening protocol for blunt cerebrovascular injury using computed tomography angiography","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of neurosurgery","topic":"Traumatic Brain Injury and Neurovascular Disturbances","field":"Medicine","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Foothills Medical Centre; University of Calgary; University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Medicine; Asymptomatic; Stroke (engine); Computed tomography angiography; Radiology; Trauma center; Blunt; Blunt trauma; Population; Angiography; Injury Severity Score; Retrospective cohort study; Internal medicine; Emergency medicine; Poison control; Injury prevention","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.009323128,0.0004006508,0.0003836696,0.001243065,0.0004493247,0.0008266431,0.0007096664,0.0005165469,0.0008796611],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04373651,0.0002196231,0.0003794073,0.0008246067,0.000319466,0.0006349589,0.0007336834,0.0005622526,0.0002037966],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009716118,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.003858082,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003151892,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002873312,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922137,0.004566942,0.001157121,0.000436194,0.001370581,0.0002555798],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9771753,0.009020765,0.006215048,0.001873952,0.004494763,0.001220219],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0022106,0.002333816,0.8068668,0.0005019808,0.0001660418,0.001375053,0.0006770604,0.003333099,0.00475287,0.0004267571,0.004622164,0.1727339],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0005879574,0.007310238,0.9621072,0.0004983089,0.0002175743,0.003088104,0.0006955002,0.01547813,0.005434415,0.0004076354,0.004087006,0.00008792416],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9734346,0.000841621,0.01288524,0.001568786,0.0001652389,0.003684034,0.0004357071,0.000289323,0.006695411],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9789928,0.0003679573,0.01843065,0.000357332,0.00009438496,0.001009947,0.0005044622,0.00001233902,0.0002300945],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.009323128,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.04930604,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09869272376357811,"score_gpt":0.3732639928544152,"score_spread":0.2745712690908371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}