{"id":"W2341639504","doi":"10.4141/cjps2011-261","title":"Assessment of genetic diversity in 35 <i>Pisum sativum</i> accessions using microsatellite markers","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Plant Science","topic":"Genetic and Environmental Crop Studies","field":"Agricultural and Biological Sciences","cited_by":29,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"McGill University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Biology; UPGMA; Sativum; Pisum; Genetic diversity; Germplasm; Microsatellite; Gene pool; Field pea; Crop; Genetic distance; Botany; Horticulture; Genotype; Genetic variation; Allele; Genetics; Agronomy; Gene; Population","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004771142,0.00006307052,0.0001177419,0.00004986873,0.0003904331,0.00002094333,0.0003206694,0.00002302387,0.00008310833],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001859029,0.00002741595,0.00003518289,0.0003064311,0.0003611717,0.0001724543,0.00009691565,0.00007896197,9.209339e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001384975,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001105438,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.009158434,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.01412247,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991655,0.00003064894,0.0001906901,0.00008242708,0.0002109792,0.0003197392],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999422,0.0000380821,0.0001393126,0.00002623227,0.00002201767,0.0003524029],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00000167957,0.0000105309,0.8740707,0.000001539987,0.000002091466,0.000006408439,0.0001494406,0.00004910157,0.124105,0.000006556788,0.00003020996,0.001566733],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004965449,0.00005641587,0.9973074,0.00003412735,0.000006773436,0.00003474285,0.0007596806,0.00002864195,0.001156216,0.00001787335,0.0004882899,0.00006018878],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9989744,0.0004121973,0.000007251131,0.00006224736,0.0001819849,0.00004241026,0.00006261514,5.761614e-7,0.0002562505],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9989266,0.00006840482,0.000913385,0.00004996071,0.00003275245,1.478604e-7,8.72732e-7,2.738433e-7,0.000007579872],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1232367,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9974397,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.04132582802446589,"score_gpt":0.2386897826078993,"score_spread":0.1973639545834334,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}