{"id":"W2341913851","doi":"10.1890/15-0525","title":"Maintaining animal assemblages through single‐species management: the case of threatened caribou in boreal forest","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Applications","topic":"Forest Management and Policy","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":62,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Natural Resources Canada; Université Laval; Canadian Forest Service; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Fonds de recherche du Québec – Nature et technologies; Canada Foundation for Innovation; Université du Québec à Chicoutimi","keywords":"Threatened species; Boreal; Ecology; Taiga; Woodland caribou; Habitat; Context (archaeology); Endangered species; Geography; Ecological succession; Habitat destruction; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001955389,0.000304647,0.0003196589,0.0004705519,0.0009322007,0.0008562853,0.0008630172,0.000610906,0.0003600411],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003874892,0.0001720799,0.000359856,0.0003734434,0.00124674,0.0007378862,0.000557428,0.0002622501,0.00004753912],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009198288,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005861008,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.04522907,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.137485,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9994382,0.0003048592,0.00002150135,0.00008642439,0.0000618902,0.00008716239],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9984243,0.0005523197,0.000503926,0.0001665476,0.0001098912,0.0002431188],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002272859,0.000326793,0.9423558,0.0000653985,0.0001627873,0.001692056,0.00160891,0.03219055,0.001910135,0.001189403,0.0002474031,0.0180235],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000347496,0.0009332405,0.8616003,0.00004622121,0.0001190757,0.001487278,0.005571523,0.1256273,0.0006651733,0.002628361,0.001233603,0.00005320237],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9992635,0.00005795671,0.0004115205,0.00006634802,0.000001126604,0.000003712348,0.000008186853,0.000004521999,0.0001832368],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999346,0.00003711903,0.0005531207,0.00001023302,0.000001356844,0.000002849172,0.000009525893,0.000001123322,0.00003871215],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04522907,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08993161,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02529477809503071,"score_gpt":0.2609756026143837,"score_spread":0.235680824519353,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}