{"id":"W2342073150","doi":"10.1108/jdoc-09-2015-0111","title":"On the composition of scientific abstracts","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Documentation","topic":"Advanced Text Analysis Techniques","field":"Computer Science","cited_by":40,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Université du Québec à Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Sentence; Computer science; Rhetorical question; Argumentation theory; Relation (database); Information retrieval; Originality; Similarity (geometry); Scientific writing; Composition (language); Value (mathematics); Linguistics; Natural language processing; Artificial intelligence; Sociology; Qualitative research","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0005761395,0.00004044314,0.0000742152,0.0001526334,0.00005766597,0.00008001317,0.0003308732,0.00001278923,0.00002435465],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00004697774,0.00001981332,0.00006132214,0.0002000601,0.00004816929,0.001047699,0.00002180539,0.00004298615,0.00001043433],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0000544818,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002313943,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.000001087841,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":7.121263e-7,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991562,0.00004918841,0.0003119743,0.00006694288,0.0003584615,0.00005722961],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9987911,0.000194099,0.0006179136,0.0001694714,0.000206207,0.00002119595],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002009128,0.00008894367,0.000202666,0.000003305074,0.00002876129,0.000003879211,0.0002384826,0.000196932,0.817978,0.1028931,0.001769838,0.07657597],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00028048,0.0002113524,0.005436606,0.0001159726,0.00001342936,0.00001559772,0.00001829587,0.0001313621,0.8867733,0.1066447,0.0003077374,0.00005108739],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.5095412,0.00001067703,0.4878926,0.002120086,0.0001054646,0.00003092811,3.336094e-7,0.000009184007,0.0002895847],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9825998,0.000007293326,0.0172355,0.0000632464,0.00001816844,7.946938e-7,2.086855e-7,0.000001827016,0.00007318478],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4730586,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.08079638,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01361670198581772,"score_gpt":0.3029858504638016,"score_spread":0.2893691484779839,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}