{"id":"W2342136198","doi":"10.2166/wqrjc.2016.034","title":"Scenario-based quantitative microbial risk assessment to evaluate the robustness of a drinking water treatment plant","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Water Quality Research Journal","topic":"Fecal contamination and water quality","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":17,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada; University of Waterloo; Wilfrid Laurier University; Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada; University of Waterloo; Canadian Water Network; Public Health Agency; Polytechnique Montréal; Public Health Agency of Canada","keywords":"Risk analysis (engineering); Robustness (evolution); Risk assessment; Reliability engineering; Computer science; Quality (philosophy); Environmental science; Engineering; Business","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.007375946,0.001203215,0.0005126491,0.001695771,0.0004223979,0.001125212,0.0009907609,0.000934422,0.001364492],"category_scores_gemma":[0.01271702,0.0003229493,0.00127807,0.000712699,0.0005757957,0.001161856,0.0009710366,0.0009007324,0.00009304145],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002114067,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001460873,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008623171,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.005151447,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9968762,0.002175353,0.0001110526,0.0001831189,0.00050255,0.0001516789],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9871987,0.01032746,0.0009046373,0.0005364785,0.0008289195,0.0002038596],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001219949,0.00006316257,0.002589843,0.00003282007,0.00008432746,0.00002821814,0.00003028652,0.9918303,0.001063318,0.00146574,0.00006793781,0.00262203],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00002186648,0.0005949446,0.00187796,0.00001361458,0.00003824216,0.00003721646,0.00006998867,0.9933141,0.001601754,0.002074532,0.000326161,0.00002958765],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":"simulation_or_modeling","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7810008,0.00030535,0.208414,0.0003602075,0.00003612652,0.0006886377,0.001128491,0.0003825048,0.007683848],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.979109,0.00005685263,0.02021648,0.00002314577,0.000003479744,0.0001132167,0.0002154501,0.000009974868,0.0002522698],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.008623171,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.03900814,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1641827248327797,"score_gpt":0.429678772062876,"score_spread":0.2654960472300963,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}