{"id":"W2342186563","doi":"10.1177/0021998315608252","title":"Quantitative analysis of fatigue cracks in laminated carbon fibre-reinforced polymer composites using micro-computed tomography","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Composite Materials","topic":"Mechanical Behavior of Composites","field":"Engineering","cited_by":8,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Carleton University","funders":"","keywords":"Materials science; Composite material; Shear (geology); Fracture mechanics; Traction (geology)","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0002210468,0.000199484,0.0001162196,0.0005846736,0.0001566795,0.0001978102,0.0001718441,0.0002583513,0.0006199359],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0004436027,0.0001571258,0.0001143638,0.00024436,0.0003788009,0.0003363698,0.00009408658,0.0001618585,0.00006794121],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000223434,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001469945,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00139881,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002319751,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9999075,0.0000102191,0.000004455097,0.00001929685,0.00004577909,0.00001280084],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996692,0.0001517444,0.0000558647,0.0000225046,0.00008486646,0.00001584371],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_gemma":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000313509,0.00001108715,0.0009532072,0.00004260941,0.000002800523,0.00003863459,0.00005453519,0.002325299,0.9932909,0.00007715546,0.000008566471,0.003163724],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.000007615754,0.0002826242,0.06306752,0.00001400161,0.00002067831,0.0004491183,0.0001582187,0.08653704,0.8486536,0.0001831505,0.0005943369,0.00003218466],"study_design_candidate":"bench_or_experimental","study_design_consensus":"bench_or_experimental","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9651636,0.0003953629,0.03370876,0.00001831799,0.000003796604,0.0000444363,0.0001141025,0.0000838491,0.0004676687],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.97994,0.0001444394,0.01950943,0.000004892261,0.000002522509,0.00002180631,0.00006289865,0.000009568466,0.0003042693],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.00139881,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.002781332,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03404310233285275,"score_gpt":0.2848250289047503,"score_spread":0.2507819265718976,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}