{"id":"W2342439657","doi":"10.3109/15376516.2016.1170251","title":"A framework for <i>in vitro</i> systems toxicology assessment of e-liquids","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Toxicology Mechanisms and Methods","topic":"Effects and risks of endocrine disrupting chemicals","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":78,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"U.S. Food and Drug Administration; Philip Morris International; Cancer Research Society; American Association for Cancer Research","keywords":"Toxicity; Biochemical engineering; Computer science; Risk assessment; Electronic cigarette; Toxicology; Chemistry; Nanotechnology; Biology; Materials science; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01004205,0.002866541,0.001438362,0.003795966,0.001531394,0.006271953,0.005867232,0.003755315,0.002848898],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00538739,0.001129533,0.003121947,0.001651503,0.004481948,0.00458263,0.004859278,0.003341684,0.002406662],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00416569,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.007304762,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.008486398,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.007478828,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9922988,0.00295899,0.0008449851,0.001003828,0.002553964,0.0003395471],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9952796,0.001572981,0.0005374867,0.0008085142,0.001581475,0.0002200975],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00006393722,0.0002379932,0.001504666,0.001673676,0.0001314657,0.0007485766,0.0005916543,0.1078777,0.02229797,0.8000276,0.006687763,0.05815705],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000421209,0.0005920007,0.001057256,0.001154282,0.0002070864,0.0007056194,0.000446603,0.3547829,0.02441773,0.4001978,0.2161647,0.0002318449],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.001552209,0.001402949,0.9826232,0.001352135,0.0001198112,0.0005625645,0.0004479394,0.000655321,0.01128384],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.05591431,0.004141805,0.9297686,0.000847865,0.0002782937,0.002418612,0.001028681,0.0001750716,0.005426791],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":"methods","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01004205,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.0531081,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02265727303813046,"score_gpt":0.4322270733723363,"score_spread":0.4095698003342059,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}