{"id":"W2342525931","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v46i1.185166","title":"Early Contributions to the Evolution of the Canadian Scientific Integrity System: Institutional and Governmental Interaction in the Policy Diffusion Process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Government (linguistics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Process (computing); Political science; Rigour; Public administration; Public relations; Business; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["sts"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001687287,0.00005600926,0.00006905969,0.0002390558,0.001404763,0.0001271801,0.0003933602,0.0001461672,0.00003479195],"category_scores_gemma":[0.000766393,0.00002723015,0.00003607876,0.0005662543,0.0004437299,0.0003387793,0.000007105484,0.0005023076,0.000005506265],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.007940801,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01792607,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.8829782,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9639806,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9987913,0.0003433375,0.0002255541,0.00008149022,0.0003556525,0.0002026833],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9989491,0.0001009879,0.0001767534,0.00009653416,0.0004299734,0.0002466696],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0000161004,0.00003363156,0.1528333,0.00001279271,0.00001280239,0.000001268864,0.03594959,0.000008712995,0.0002463606,0.7912294,0.01759185,0.002064154],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001609152,0.00002586457,0.7179775,0.0004563612,0.00002190755,0.00004337192,0.03347542,0.0000046203,0.00004500599,0.00514516,0.2425677,0.00007627258],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8894878,0.0002557831,0.00004565104,0.1033941,0.002602315,0.0002622232,0.00009317182,0.000001392225,0.003857528],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9981101,0.000003356349,0.000004839875,0.000376615,0.0005965495,0.000007844949,0.000001385467,0.00000204859,0.0008973249],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.7860842,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01288030382383118,"score_gpt":0.3104841235072897,"score_spread":0.2976038196834584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}