{"id":"W2342525931","doi":"10.47678/cjhe.v46i1.185166","title":"Early Contributions to the Evolution of the Canadian Scientific Integrity System: Institutional and Governmental Interaction in the Policy Diffusion Process","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Higher Education","topic":"Academic integrity and plagiarism","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":5,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Université de Montréal; Carleton University; University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Research integrity; Misconduct; Scientific misconduct; Government (linguistics); Consistency (knowledge bases); Process (computing); Political science; Rigour; Public administration; Public relations; Business; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09536051,0.0005255874,0.0007639548,0.008552919,0.03274141,0.02231493,0.00434061,0.005261419,0.00382179],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1855259,0.001144017,0.0008033545,0.0111527,0.03462023,0.005962546,0.01004259,0.009284451,0.0002815945],"about_ca_system_candidate":true,"about_ca_system_consensus":true,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.3628573,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.4517944,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":true,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.9772858,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.9796165,"domain_scores_codex":[0.92385,0.02370504,0.003297708,0.005593483,0.02960959,0.01394416],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7886606,0.07898968,0.01961518,0.0113802,0.08055507,0.02079928],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002439485,0.0001675936,0.1348604,0.0007464387,0.0002101551,0.0007465241,0.1555407,0.004373719,0.001918741,0.5386808,0.02427425,0.1382368],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0000998583,0.0001664633,0.3243784,0.001406121,0.0002145201,0.0003090141,0.1129335,0.006453488,0.003201165,0.06436245,0.4856297,0.0008452131],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4361038,0.00891011,0.01459258,0.2535448,0.0007393954,0.000858054,0.0006512093,0.0003055104,0.2842944],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9843113,0.00141561,0.003677493,0.003666475,0.00006935163,0.0000785122,0.00007257218,0.00006243929,0.006646303],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9947386,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7389953,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01288030382383118,"score_gpt":0.3104841235072897,"score_spread":0.2976038196834584,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}