{"id":"W2342702586","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2015-0154","title":"Risk identification and assessment for engineering procurement construction management projects using fuzzy set theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Procurement; Set (abstract data type); Engineering; Computer science; Remedial education; Remedial action; Operations research; Mathematics; Business; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.004756887,0.0001801383,0.0002785885,0.001241015,0.0001480283,0.0003782442,0.000354384,0.00006365566,0.00006202737],"category_scores_gemma":[0.002044865,0.0001323585,0.0001018349,0.0003494472,0.00003770183,0.0005833674,0.00003546458,0.0001415087,0.000002344516],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0004118742,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002752107,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002949998,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000887987,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9977435,0.0000708896,0.0009193539,0.0002912637,0.0006282132,0.000346766],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9977399,0.0006079562,0.0005315843,0.0002903406,0.0004575581,0.0003727338],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001344862,0.00004140328,0.02279522,0.0003861144,0.0007355639,0.0002067868,0.002452499,0.1571547,0.06490032,0.06121058,0.002512037,0.6874703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009497841,0.0005342087,0.1563946,0.004754101,0.0008241565,0.001966923,0.005029181,0.5855037,0.006957545,0.07782583,0.1480327,0.002679222],"study_design_candidate":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.1223724,0.0002492334,0.8753209,0.0001274491,0.001379834,0.0003889315,0.00003736718,0.0000138535,0.0001100314],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9410207,0.00002463331,0.05868376,0.00001072821,0.0001678463,0.00001345246,5.586665e-7,0.00002628676,0.00005202444],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.8186483,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5397424,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07816769146154005,"score_gpt":0.3442681336861668,"score_spread":0.2661004422246268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}