{"id":"W2342702586","doi":"10.1139/cjce-2015-0154","title":"Risk identification and assessment for engineering procurement construction management projects using fuzzy set theory","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Civil Engineering","topic":"Multi-Criteria Decision Making","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":46,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"","keywords":"Identification (biology); Risk assessment; Risk analysis (engineering); Risk management; Fuzzy set; Fuzzy logic; Procurement; Set (abstract data type); Engineering; Computer science; Remedial education; Remedial action; Operations research; Mathematics; Business; Artificial intelligence","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.00542639,0.0008637568,0.0007784995,0.003399217,0.000822335,0.002007894,0.000938918,0.0008241648,0.001117105],"category_scores_gemma":[0.007981154,0.0004268074,0.001181453,0.001423168,0.001020646,0.001996085,0.001321743,0.0009377875,0.0001265707],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.002540728,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.002231014,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004101399,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.003312572,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9962381,0.00185136,0.0001626888,0.0001733992,0.001422947,0.0001514041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.995956,0.002946764,0.00034434,0.0001050689,0.0005729261,0.00007483834],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"simulation_or_modeling","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001141796,0.0001049733,0.00312555,0.0002700794,0.00009017964,0.0001691365,0.000719783,0.7745689,0.003654183,0.08468698,0.0007284005,0.1317676],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00001212349,0.00007677299,0.0007887176,0.00005448321,0.0000217398,0.00006058804,0.0002572126,0.9487084,0.001306959,0.04764396,0.001032605,0.00003644455],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"methods","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.01945209,0.0002162689,0.9776754,0.0001282628,0.000009673558,0.00008884651,0.00002042299,0.00004101208,0.002368085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.6174497,0.0005558069,0.3799285,0.00003552626,0.00002625522,0.0003279214,0.00005761567,0.0000186845,0.001599994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.00542639,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.02869785,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07816769146154005,"score_gpt":0.3442681336861668,"score_spread":0.2661004422246268,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}