{"id":"W2342903737","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2016.1176062","title":"Challenging fundraising, challenging inequity: contextual constraints on advocacy groups’ policy influence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Education","topic":"Diverse Education Studies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Equity (law); Sociology; Meritocracy; Public relations; Policy analysis; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Public administration; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Narrative inquiry; Neoliberalism (international relations); Political science; Social science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006676259,0.0001720322,0.0002668054,0.0002311833,0.0007789822,0.00004920031,0.0002084757,0.0000925913,0.0002077094],"category_scores_gemma":[0.006109076,0.0001202324,0.00005912414,0.0003708992,0.001922547,0.0003820151,0.0001159881,0.0001477299,0.0001996394],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0009738752,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0005382154,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0004493706,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001728675,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981935,0.0001210333,0.0003283862,0.0003687462,0.0003889953,0.0005993093],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9982421,0.0009636511,0.00006553212,0.0001777102,0.0003795492,0.0001714408],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000009745325,0.0002942611,0.003098289,0.00004744742,0.00002975121,0.000001767343,0.05015263,0.000002014784,0.0000191071,0.7448423,0.0005344565,0.2009682],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006916097,0.0001447407,0.02921219,0.001629558,0.00001967753,0.000003322205,0.8431196,0.000001674952,0.00002243266,0.03864037,0.08600795,0.0005068401],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.7639158,0.002619999,0.00007254263,0.08465683,0.005310386,0.0004676868,0.000005188036,0.0001279133,0.1428237],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9922319,0.004711115,0.00004282287,0.001031412,0.001168788,0.00008420213,8.532466e-7,0.00001168972,0.0007171949],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.792967,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7313576,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09871622130925349,"score_gpt":0.4561475665999117,"score_spread":0.3574313452906582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}