{"id":"W2342903737","doi":"10.1080/17508487.2016.1176062","title":"Challenging fundraising, challenging inequity: contextual constraints on advocacy groups’ policy influence","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Critical Studies in Education","topic":"Diverse Education Studies and Reforms","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":38,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"York University","funders":"Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Equity (law); Sociology; Meritocracy; Public relations; Policy analysis; Government (linguistics); Public policy; Public administration; Rhetorical question; Context (archaeology); Narrative; Narrative inquiry; Neoliberalism (international relations); Political science; Social science; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.02869092,0.0004103857,0.0005823361,0.002714541,0.04037569,0.01847905,0.002237242,0.003589812,0.004638287],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03927786,0.0005240169,0.0003691794,0.002686028,0.06625199,0.005808373,0.01337526,0.004409599,0.0001744435],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.09453821,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.09758039,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.6264374,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.7566947,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9715028,0.01746432,0.0005375121,0.001605723,0.003944946,0.004944793],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9635828,0.02534324,0.002429699,0.001636723,0.003494266,0.003513267],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002889177,0.00003460254,0.006501883,0.00009469037,0.00001433273,0.0004353307,0.8214567,0.0001489581,0.000311556,0.1610015,0.001818184,0.008153453],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003303706,0.00002829526,0.01055731,0.0004592073,0.00004198904,0.00008959771,0.7970401,0.0002779956,0.0003893867,0.05529736,0.1357413,0.0000443452],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.6353289,0.00224292,0.006025277,0.07478946,0.0003529461,0.0002867561,0.0001127972,0.00004128395,0.2808197],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9959551,0.0002072376,0.0005328032,0.0009785253,0.00002112811,0.00003438794,0.000008946727,0.00001346542,0.002248488],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6264374,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7515251,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.09871622130925349,"score_gpt":0.4561475665999117,"score_spread":0.3574313452906582,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}