{"id":"W2343541587","doi":"10.1515/bejm-2015-0008","title":"Testing monetary policy optimality using volatility outcomes: a novel approach","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The B E Journal of Macroeconomics","topic":"Monetary Policy and Economic Impact","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"HEC Montréal","funders":"","keywords":"Economics; Monetary policy; Volatility (finance); New Keynesian economics; Dynamic stochastic general equilibrium; Business cycle; Econometrics; Interest rate; Exploit; Inflation (cosmology); Monetary economics; Macroeconomics; Computer science","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.003145605,0.0002820972,0.0008337155,0.0003105744,0.0001919294,0.00006846705,0.0007794619,0.0001188612,0.0001078955],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0006236738,0.0001905353,0.0003180284,0.0001463378,0.0002070218,0.000757815,0.0001450105,0.0002756655,0.00009890198],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0005304034,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001130754,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001484299,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00000827214,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9973608,0.00004871336,0.00176265,0.0002648326,0.0000382908,0.0005247251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9967114,0.0004714567,0.00196335,0.0006122752,0.00003906529,0.0002024502],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004216181,0.0004882736,0.9083015,0.00007425797,0.001051974,0.000004460112,0.001419544,0.06525623,0.001021827,0.01667181,0.0006750803,0.004613442],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.005276767,0.0003339145,0.6188269,0.00007665399,0.0001321237,0.001092999,0.00028574,0.3060102,0.0002751741,0.06090289,0.005620922,0.001165641],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9625528,0.0003779156,0.03096657,0.002078813,0.0003110357,0.0001671926,0.0002596012,0.00001515754,0.003270905],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9808847,0.00007867594,0.01754746,0.0007140841,0.000545015,0.000001448054,0.000001246838,0.00003730429,0.0001900927],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.2894745,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.7769806,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1692667280980688,"score_gpt":0.2740053944814059,"score_spread":0.1047386663833371,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}