{"id":"W2343721711","doi":"10.1080/14737167.2016.1182865","title":"A further examination of the problem of double-counting in incremental cost-utility analyses","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"editorial","venue":"Expert Review of Pharmacoeconomics & Outcomes Research","topic":"Health Systems, Economic Evaluations, Quality of Life","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Institute for Clinical Evaluative Sciences; SickKids Foundation; Hospital for Sick Children; University of Toronto","funders":"McMaster University","keywords":"Cost–utility analysis; Productivity; Operations management; Economics; Econometrics; Actuarial science; Operations research; Computer science; Cost effectiveness; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09519388,0.002640446,0.004384603,0.003467664,0.002184177,0.008109387,0.00546733,0.01518687,0.008937402],"category_scores_gemma":[0.3207239,0.001059071,0.004778054,0.003819431,0.008767295,0.00875332,0.002411907,0.03771676,0.00400477],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004927474,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.005635345,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.002596543,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00383386,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9399213,0.03210058,0.006578898,0.004202437,0.01671488,0.0004818956],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.4870177,0.4639467,0.007184329,0.008419839,0.03173677,0.001694697],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"methods","domain_candidate":"methods","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001268851,0.00002021763,0.0001505379,0.002485579,0.0002918376,0.000196657,0.0002463871,0.0004711673,0.0001098425,0.04208541,0.8700377,0.08377779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001380871,0.00007544423,0.0004114061,0.00654318,0.0002979819,0.0007587564,0.000108767,0.001414599,0.0002896442,0.06421362,0.9256501,0.00009836114],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"editorial","genre_gemma":"editorial","genre_scores_codex":[0.0002616134,0.1473148,0.01980982,0.3630652,0.4624901,0.0001066552,0.0004194494,0.0002319635,0.006300442],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.006355806,0.05998608,0.01152893,0.1825901,0.7320839,0.0001988122,0.00009347915,0.0004767507,0.006686094],"genre_candidate":"editorial","genre_consensus":"editorial","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9048061,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5034394,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3847599826893071,"score_gpt":0.6370176872461477,"score_spread":0.2522577045568407,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}