{"id":"W2344558615","doi":"10.1007/s00204-016-1717-8","title":"Expert consensus on an in vitro approach to assess pulmonary fibrogenic potential of aerosolized nanomaterials","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Archives of Toxicology","topic":"Nanoparticles: synthesis and applications","field":"Materials Science","cited_by":66,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Health Canada","funders":"National Institute for Occupational Safety and Health; National Institute of Environmental Health Sciences; U.S. Environmental Protection Agency","keywords":"Inhalation; Adverse Outcome Pathway; Pulmonary fibrosis; Pulmonary toxicity; Aerosolization; Inhalation exposure; Nanotoxicology; Medicine; In vivo; Adverse effect; Toxicity; Pharmacology; Risk analysis (engineering); Fibrosis; Nanotechnology; Toxicology; Pathology; Biology; Biotechnology; Materials science; Computational biology; Internal medicine; Anesthesia","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.07747342,0.001311705,0.002083727,0.002352691,0.002246642,0.004946408,0.005937505,0.01260388,0.005162816],"category_scores_gemma":[0.04257501,0.0009915404,0.004179143,0.001506477,0.002588366,0.004552616,0.005066186,0.01093349,0.003967729],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.004328155,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01674839,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003237086,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.004625376,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9569788,0.01865674,0.00678242,0.002962407,0.01224106,0.002378509],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9105839,0.01922947,0.003201384,0.001947652,0.0607693,0.004268406],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"not_applicable","study_design_gemma":"not_applicable","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0006692215,0.0005226834,0.002232172,0.0226947,0.0002847047,0.001540442,0.003802114,0.001473412,0.03186424,0.01562397,0.5679986,0.3512937],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009154346,0.0003685529,0.0009873502,0.01193269,0.0001910998,0.0007203792,0.00314039,0.0003666201,0.006976551,0.008329859,0.9667683,0.0001266569],"study_design_candidate":"not_applicable","study_design_consensus":"not_applicable","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"methods","genre_scores_codex":[0.00900156,0.190744,0.03887856,0.628114,0.07960332,0.003557091,0.001495697,0.0003105322,0.0482953],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.06485982,0.2812119,0.1158719,0.4579318,0.02644021,0.007863598,0.003218495,0.0004285968,0.04217366],"genre_candidate":"methods","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.07747342,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4097235,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.03549804258791876,"score_gpt":0.2884587522041163,"score_spread":0.2529607096161975,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}