{"id":"W2344727237","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolind.2016.02.057","title":"A forest structure habitat index based on airborne laser scanning data","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Indicators","topic":"Remote Sensing and LiDAR Applications","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":94,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta; University of British Columbia","funders":"Government of Alberta","keywords":"Biodiversity; Habitat; Species richness; Vegetation (pathology); Ecology; Geography; Index (typography); Environmental science; Land cover; Remote sensing; Environmental resource management; Physical geography; Land use; Computer science; Biology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000204448,0.0001454605,0.0001332242,0.0000610815,0.0002006335,0.00002623498,0.0005979892,0.0001562675,0.002945649],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0002171188,0.00008261687,0.00003558151,0.0003271555,0.0003554186,0.0001003383,0.0002843341,0.0001458821,0.0007415377],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001367459,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000188233,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00002428416,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003152903,"domain_scores_codex":[0.998626,0.00006734754,0.0001722018,0.0005469428,0.0002726207,0.0003148891],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9986925,0.0002405125,0.00009266447,0.0007900965,0.000003169957,0.0001810548],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00002529592,0.0001702408,0.9229085,0.000001701245,0.000008483755,0.00001398888,0.00002111534,0.001745685,0.0008567431,0.0001153905,0.03114723,0.04298556],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002531967,0.00009100762,0.9584824,0.00001014614,0.000007217873,0.000002066728,0.000008366548,0.003399957,0.0004778312,0.0006882303,0.0364231,0.0001564505],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9868872,0.000001832242,0.001259278,0.002658411,0.00007712733,0.0001926355,0.00006101807,0.00009877464,0.008763748],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9970883,0.000001140022,0.001374258,0.001138584,0.0000567612,0.000003842417,0.00003599323,0.00001318523,0.0002879193],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.04282911,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9979658,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01563267697596427,"score_gpt":0.2470177212555005,"score_spread":0.2313850442795363,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}