{"id":"W2345444281","doi":"10.14507/epaa.24.2391","title":"Measuring, rating, supporting, and strengthening open access scholarly publishing in Brazil","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Education Policy Analysis Archives","topic":"scientometrics and bibliometrics research","field":"Decision Sciences","cited_by":16,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"Simon Fraser University","funders":"","keywords":"Scholarship; Publication; Publishing; Context (archaeology); Discipline; Political science; Public relations; Quality (philosophy); Field (mathematics); Bibliometrics; Open access publishing; Library science; Open science; Sociology; Regional science; Social science; Computer science; Geography; Statistics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","bibliometrics","open_science"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01970921,0.0002866698,0.0005827789,0.01017986,0.001469502,0.005001219,0.0007815466,0.0004314396,0.001086311],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1055715,0.0002467052,0.0003027926,0.0142388,0.002248283,0.002882969,0.002962928,0.0004631525,0.0001836236],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.005494038,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01264219,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0296809,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03838419,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9813561,0.005626469,0.002192428,0.0008977106,0.008955421,0.0009717259],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8943615,0.0506851,0.02339861,0.004605701,0.02310139,0.003847701],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":"evaluation","domain_candidate":"evaluation","domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001132572,0.0001673992,0.7154548,0.001195693,0.0001641174,0.0005070011,0.02083846,0.001566556,0.002940339,0.03111476,0.002259887,0.2236779],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00004775533,0.0002748971,0.8863838,0.001304868,0.000282485,0.000554494,0.03081119,0.006004509,0.003542981,0.01551785,0.05518039,0.00009474674],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.949553,0.002606048,0.002558013,0.003608467,0.00004304325,0.0001706119,0.0005328381,0.00004606711,0.04088204],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9967645,0.0008851821,0.001687733,0.00005028923,0.00001720684,0.00002555653,0.0001187882,0.000005926867,0.0004447799],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9992185,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1042336,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.5781505496477423,"score_gpt":0.6231597253924955,"score_spread":0.04500917574475327,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}