{"id":"W2345737162","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.050","title":"A comparison of two methods to evaluate a narrow spinal canal: routine magnetic resonance imaging versus three-dimensional reconstruction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Spine Journal","topic":"Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis; Canada Research Chairs; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions","keywords":"Medicine; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sagittal plane; Context (archaeology); Lumbar; Spinal stenosis; Spinal canal; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Lordosis; Radiology; Nuclear medicine; Spinal cord; Radiography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01191916,0.001681875,0.002768866,0.006368423,0.0004773142,0.002444945,0.001809139,0.002416756,0.002399856],"category_scores_gemma":[0.03348188,0.001102146,0.001122652,0.001691315,0.001435504,0.002975124,0.001761599,0.001320446,0.0006612155],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0006800574,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001116448,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001957847,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.002938561,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9936545,0.002638254,0.0007772662,0.0007576981,0.001882519,0.000289765],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.958694,0.02977728,0.002968601,0.002186624,0.005230199,0.001143389],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.09588056,0.002661997,0.2104051,0.005040283,0.004103196,0.0008878668,0.002226979,0.008958588,0.04614577,0.002264939,0.002375631,0.6190491],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.009983697,0.05342933,0.651354,0.001885315,0.01061775,0.02762302,0.004711867,0.1793914,0.04442566,0.004549842,0.01022374,0.001804325],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.8566964,0.03296978,0.101223,0.001142635,0.0009203854,0.0007392184,0.0008965577,0.0007290686,0.004683085],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8930333,0.01007403,0.09313925,0.0004439121,0.0003891156,0.0003513983,0.0006631502,0.0004661763,0.00143974],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.01191916,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.06303525,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07161389630682188,"score_gpt":0.4359252641588315,"score_spread":0.3643113678520096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}