{"id":"W2345737162","doi":"10.1016/j.spinee.2016.02.050","title":"A comparison of two methods to evaluate a narrow spinal canal: routine magnetic resonance imaging versus three-dimensional reconstruction","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"The Spine Journal","topic":"Spine and Intervertebral Disc Pathology","field":"Medicine","cited_by":6,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"University of Alberta","funders":"Institute of Musculoskeletal Health and Arthritis; Canada Research Chairs; Canadian Institutes of Health Research; Alberta Innovates - Health Solutions","keywords":"Medicine; Magnetic resonance imaging; Sagittal plane; Context (archaeology); Lumbar; Spinal stenosis; Spinal canal; Lumbar spinal stenosis; Lordosis; Radiology; Nuclear medicine; Spinal cord; Radiography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001356405,0.0001843577,0.0004825362,0.0001899934,0.0001279798,0.00001343665,0.0001975628,0.00003945378,0.001077058],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00052951,0.00009724162,0.0001974856,0.0002479465,0.0001836097,0.0001055657,0.00008375646,0.0003349547,0.00004575791],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001426866,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001878599,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0002144884,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000179587,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9981341,0.0002580534,0.0006639532,0.0002227759,0.0003705114,0.0003506436],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988495,0.000009553331,0.0002821646,0.0003111867,0.0003545629,0.0001929972],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"design_other","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004560653,0.00008837855,0.006950351,0.00001225101,0.00004321698,0.0000397387,0.0001001611,0.00002555658,0.3240744,0.0001889776,0.00350067,0.6645202],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.01026822,0.005750647,0.9486717,0.001154095,0.0004204963,0.006331787,0.0001341422,0.007757656,0.01773638,0.0008671702,0.0006595867,0.0002481508],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9656534,0.006959771,0.01094612,0.01407946,0.001329228,0.0002423352,0.00000466077,0.00002431988,0.0007606652],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9427508,0.00001410455,0.05558202,0.0005275143,0.0005728884,0.000008699795,9.938404e-7,0.00002436368,0.0005186534],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.9417213,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998361,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.07161389630682188,"score_gpt":0.4359252641588315,"score_spread":0.3643113678520096,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}