{"id":"W2345830636","doi":"10.2495/safe-v6-n1-10-18","title":"Hurricane vulnerability of coastal bridges using multiple environmental parameters","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"International Journal of Safety and Security Engineering","topic":"Tropical and Extratropical Cyclones Research","field":"Earth and Planetary Sciences","cited_by":14,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Georgia Department of Transportation; U.S. Department of Transportation","keywords":"Storm surge; Fragility; Environmental science; Storm; Vulnerability assessment; Bridge (graph theory); Wind speed; Hazard; Vulnerability (computing); Hazard analysis; Engineering; Meteorology; Computer science; Geography","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0001345277,0.00006437492,0.0001357379,0.00006075616,0.00002174347,0.00001311167,0.0001457052,0.00003104204,0.0001635385],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0001242893,0.00004160661,0.00006388517,0.00002767895,0.00008871063,0.0001936561,0.00002051818,0.0001128955,0.000001554579],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00001205214,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0000126602,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0003837059,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0001192826,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9991854,0.00002575264,0.000279465,0.00007646551,0.0003196802,0.0001131652],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999469,0.0002744414,0.00007899127,0.00003825203,0.00003508692,0.0001042351],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0004110399,0.00003898157,0.9195657,0.0000119896,0.0000731529,0.00003592523,0.00009596484,0.009834816,0.008768528,0.00008744,0.000001948006,0.06107449],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006687287,0.000143285,0.9637638,0.00005814007,0.000007060981,0.0001280404,0.00004940786,0.03239725,0.001775817,0.0001885366,0.0007359028,0.00008403942],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9905803,0.000207729,0.008555228,0.0002622263,0.0002083845,0.00002430481,0.0001484679,0.000003168253,0.00001026068],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9985362,0.000287433,0.001069946,0.000007845144,0.00009202245,3.919882e-8,0.000002994421,0.000001600152,0.000001899175],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.06099045,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.1790632,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01193812226307935,"score_gpt":0.2217330208171251,"score_spread":0.2097948985540458,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}