{"id":"W2346583519","doi":"10.1111/j.1540-5982.2012.01750.x","title":"Bilateral exposures and systemic solvency risk","year":2012,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Canadian Journal of Economics/Revue canadienne d économique","topic":"Banking stability, regulation, efficiency","field":"Economics, Econometrics and Finance","cited_by":86,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Toronto","funders":"","keywords":"Solvency; Systemic risk; Uniqueness; Balance sheet; Economics; Econometrics; Balance (ability); Measure (data warehouse); Monetary economics; Computer science; Mathematics; Macroeconomics; Financial crisis; Finance; Market liquidity; Medicine","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.001320716,0.0002304256,0.0004313666,0.0006445785,0.0003060148,0.001971642,0.0003248602,0.0008806004,0.005422757],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00681724,0.0002028587,0.0002553887,0.0006004191,0.00101173,0.001764654,0.001564664,0.0009023602,0.0002355045],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0007879692,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0003812463,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00100509,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0006251012,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992751,0.0002168629,0.00004723194,0.0001501322,0.0002137297,0.0000970176],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9958448,0.001291342,0.001895536,0.0002469496,0.0003183185,0.0004031261],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002082156,0.0002009248,0.09731217,0.0000862608,0.0002484081,0.0007333308,0.00115734,0.1166522,0.006854401,0.7389271,0.001715497,0.03590408],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00006259355,0.0001463547,0.06542193,0.00005257541,0.0000856426,0.0004329498,0.0003903338,0.1453722,0.00136979,0.7833925,0.003222109,0.00005107724],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":null,"genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9288443,0.0005539755,0.05331029,0.001395141,0.00002490182,0.00002810147,0.0001671714,0.00005645115,0.01561965],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980532,0.000084921,0.0006534632,0.00001546728,0.00002521395,0.000007280505,0.00002379011,0.00000264387,0.001134141],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.005422757,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.01814097,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.0814995400277286,"score_gpt":0.1771075888081258,"score_spread":0.09560804878039716,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}