{"id":"W2346698748","doi":"10.1016/j.ecolecon.2016.04.021","title":"The rise and fall of the sand monopoly in colonial Hong Kong","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Ecological Economics","topic":"Colonialism, slavery, and trade","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"New York Institute of Technology","funders":"","keywords":"Monopoly; Colonialism; Business; Economic history; Economy; Political science; Economics; Ancient history; Law; Geography; History; Market economy","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006331475,0.0000651269,0.000136916,0.00001430683,0.0003624361,0.0000450788,0.0002779801,0.0001138213,0.00004301489],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0003225734,0.00003190084,0.00005291784,0.00005466551,0.0008238562,0.00007686547,0.00009686509,0.00008105244,0.000007491408],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0001147719,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0001192279,"about_ca_topic_candidate":true,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0007616957,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.05741288,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999208,0.0001612234,0.0002020567,0.0001481862,0.00004407839,0.0002363968],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9988369,0.0008816684,0.00009868002,0.0001163136,0.00001211054,0.00005434843],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001549858,0.0001666981,0.8347811,0.000003988634,0.00003335713,0.000004709378,0.009084122,0.00003597442,0.00008628976,0.1221425,0.0007274345,0.03277893],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0006177009,0.00006857883,0.8855547,0.000005779142,0.000007111926,5.895433e-7,0.0003990488,0.00004624379,0.0001045666,0.02422665,0.08887522,0.00009384182],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9826671,0.0001400842,0.000001056258,0.01239449,0.0004080957,0.0002140491,0.000008399003,0.000009473254,0.004157278],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9984167,0.0009593096,0.00001324278,0.0001014725,0.0001204509,0.00001177314,5.439228e-8,0.000003264257,0.0003737426],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09791582,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9597869,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01477077053277723,"score_gpt":0.2479224787421815,"score_spread":0.2331517082094043,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}