{"id":"W2346874151","doi":"10.1016/j.scs.2016.04.015","title":"Analysis of urban heat island phenomenon and mitigation solutions evaluation for Montreal","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Sustainable Cities and Society","topic":"Urban Heat Island Mitigation","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":146,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":false,"ca_institutions":"Concordia University","funders":"Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada","keywords":"Urban heat island; Urban climate; Environmental science; Thermal comfort; Climate change; Urbanization; Greenhouse gas; Albedo (alchemy); Scale (ratio); Megacity; Urban planning; Environmental resource management; Climatology; Meteorology; Geography; Environmental planning; Civil engineering; Engineering; Economic growth; Cartography","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":true,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004645313,0.00007668821,0.0001375132,0.00003258729,0.0002605455,0.00002148226,0.00003094429,0.00005458984,0.0001552289],"category_scores_gemma":[0.0000359271,0.00005799738,0.00007868426,0.0001890107,0.0002263105,0.0002541195,0.00004686095,0.00001951188,3.738595e-7],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.0002058883,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00002044624,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0009623048,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003104729,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9992565,0.00003286111,0.0001420599,0.0001874871,0.0001596236,0.0002215041],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9996562,0.0001010622,0.0000427536,0.00009379578,0.00006041248,0.00004577911],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0001313201,0.0001936337,0.7710745,0.0004900704,0.001553819,9.106354e-7,0.08116045,0.003591167,0.01297644,0.02371365,0.06076556,0.04434854],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.002897558,0.0003303478,0.8033844,0.00003031803,0.001825347,0.000001250828,0.04798197,0.1056915,0.0005912887,0.03218806,0.004663859,0.0004141281],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.989588,0.0003333879,0.00733859,0.0003615459,0.0000161211,0.0004410915,0.00007967215,0.00001226505,0.001829364],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.99635,0.0001739688,0.0001976121,0.00003966906,0.00002337207,0.00007233741,0.00004149677,0.000005467247,0.003096073],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1021004,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2365064,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.008718995247480384,"score_gpt":0.2183514790110097,"score_spread":0.2096324837635293,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}