{"id":"W2346979388","doi":"10.1093/phe/phw019","title":"Culling and the Common Good: Re-evaluating Harms and Benefits under the One Health Paradigm","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Public Health Ethics","topic":"Zoonotic diseases and public health","field":"Medicine","cited_by":64,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Calgary","funders":"National University of Singapore","keywords":"Culling; Premise; One Health; Public health; Human health; Influenza A virus subtype H5N1; Environmental ethics; Human animal; Animal health; Environmental health; Business; Political science; Environmental resource management; Biology; Medicine; Ecology; Livestock; Veterinary medicine; Epistemology; Virology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.1619232,0.001945892,0.003283198,0.005528132,0.005862875,0.01590121,0.00445236,0.01384177,0.004821551],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1729449,0.0007489366,0.002530357,0.003002471,0.1025361,0.03136837,0.01477819,0.01771043,0.0004212262],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.02018167,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.01968675,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.006479006,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.006168703,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8197837,0.1447617,0.004662334,0.007623462,0.01811102,0.005057823],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7385943,0.2051735,0.01649056,0.02046687,0.01561971,0.003655156],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_gemma":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_scores_codex":[0.000107896,0.00006639796,0.001317633,0.0004584908,0.0001529938,0.0001260446,0.002081771,0.001867367,0.00007666616,0.9729881,0.002065088,0.01869162],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00003216168,0.0001084737,0.0006244693,0.0009272773,0.00009160691,0.00006630995,0.001526837,0.001028862,0.0001287991,0.9841354,0.01129607,0.00003373236],"study_design_candidate":"theoretical_or_conceptual","study_design_consensus":"theoretical_or_conceptual","genre_codex":"commentary","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.05634038,0.0592195,0.1604169,0.5162926,0.004410966,0.0009105608,0.0003108751,0.00007626875,0.2020219],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8930755,0.0125214,0.03572492,0.0514829,0.002706636,0.0008835141,0.00006808643,0.00007279711,0.00346435],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":null,"teacher_disagreement_score":0.1619232,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.8563419,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.3491393352957695,"score_gpt":0.4460106617266467,"score_spread":0.09687132643087726,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}