{"id":"W2347160310","doi":"10.15402/esj.v1i1.40","title":"Building Critical Community Engagement through Scholarship: Three Case Studies","year":2015,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Engaged Scholar Journal Community-Engaged Research Teaching and Learning","topic":"Innovation and Socioeconomic Development","field":"Business, Management and Accounting","cited_by":4,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"Universiti Malaysia Sarawak","keywords":"Scholarship; Sociology; Transformative learning; Indigenous; Ideology; Engaged scholarship; Hegemony; Public relations; Environmental ethics; Political science; Politics; Pedagogy; Law","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":true,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["metaresearch","metaepi_narrow","sts","scholarly_communication","research_integrity"],"consensus_categories":["metaresearch"],"category_scores_codex":[0.8730437,0.000468448,0.0006215392,0.001023407,0.5258721,0.004454637,0.001055047,0.0002411512,0.00007463358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.7845024,0.000442877,0.0001427658,0.0006823956,0.0006276466,0.00542589,0.002156356,0.6853659,0.0001340558],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000656063,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002101661,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.001266267,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.000174109,"domain_scores_codex":[0.4502605,0.5469256,0.0007490884,0.0002643553,0.0009060179,0.0008944438],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.8248108,0.171522,0.000410219,0.0008100041,0.002222076,0.0002249035],"domain_codex":"methods","domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002310127,0.0008832,0.0113833,0.0007181678,0.0007533028,0.001757563,0.9146078,0.0006454478,0.001736186,0.0165118,0.007022766,0.04374947],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001575143,0.0001352634,0.001605856,0.0003897579,0.00004969038,0.001090879,0.8990037,0.0004216309,0.00002209996,0.01680688,0.07839332,0.0005057828],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9861218,0.001027143,0.002261575,0.001985169,0.000832663,0.0003099116,0.000001112957,0.0003007828,0.007159808],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9786333,0.00006865216,0.01840776,0.001425433,0.001056693,0.00002963186,0.0000138412,0.00009522897,0.0002694171],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.6851248,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9998023,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.4498610643777042,"score_gpt":0.4540513347599548,"score_spread":0.004190270382250671,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}