{"id":"W2347199873","doi":"10.1080/09640568.2016.1146576","title":"Revealing inadvertent elitism in stakeholder models of environmental governance: assessing procedural justice in sustainability organizations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Elitism; Procedural justice; Civil society; Business; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public relations; Stakeholder engagement; Environmental governance; Environmental resource management; Public administration; Economics; Politics; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.09194838,0.0003497891,0.0004298925,0.00251387,0.009829383,0.008092953,0.001966287,0.002066555,0.001168835],"category_scores_gemma":[0.1702395,0.00041909,0.000552111,0.001966356,0.02890049,0.006615286,0.00948993,0.002907615,0.0001126638],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.03250831,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.02612196,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.1358814,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.1983194,"domain_scores_codex":[0.8993774,0.06607609,0.003741961,0.002962516,0.02219849,0.005643539],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.7959532,0.1326725,0.02780942,0.0152182,0.02499758,0.003349131],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"qualitative","study_design_gemma":"qualitative","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0002425554,0.0003291489,0.2043711,0.0002555684,0.00009815442,0.0003208393,0.6396425,0.004257058,0.001484613,0.11012,0.0007769932,0.03810149],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00005790815,0.0003145789,0.1304903,0.0005134328,0.00009505304,0.0001936027,0.7427186,0.01818427,0.003724881,0.09089215,0.01268538,0.0001299425],"study_design_candidate":"qualitative","study_design_consensus":"qualitative","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9662943,0.00005991234,0.01399481,0.001720447,0.00001110026,0.0002333134,0.0000230053,0.00001125595,0.01765183],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9980525,0.00001785693,0.001400811,0.0001229193,0.000001647124,0.00006925269,0.000009853692,0.000005368273,0.0003198305],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1358814,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.4862753,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01853818347990775,"score_gpt":0.2406765116037782,"score_spread":0.2221383281238705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}