{"id":"W2347199873","doi":"10.1080/09640568.2016.1146576","title":"Revealing inadvertent elitism in stakeholder models of environmental governance: assessing procedural justice in sustainability organizations","year":2016,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Environmental Planning and Management","topic":"Sustainability and Climate Change Governance","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":33,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Saskatchewan","funders":"","keywords":"Sustainability; Stakeholder; Corporate governance; Elitism; Procedural justice; Civil society; Business; Government (linguistics); Political science; Public relations; Stakeholder engagement; Environmental governance; Environmental resource management; Public administration; Economics; Politics; Psychology","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0006094643,0.0001880746,0.0002850398,0.00007826369,0.00007586076,0.00002124192,0.000200216,0.00006542232,0.0001979938],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00006260128,0.000152864,0.000043763,0.00018085,0.0002450344,0.0009690953,0.0002964234,0.0001594849,0.000002117518],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001812958,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00001386235,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.00003644277,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001807955,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9980991,0.00007956481,0.000679381,0.0003033092,0.0004877858,0.0003508098],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9991968,0.0000776852,0.0004577739,0.0001721876,0.000005308495,0.0000903035],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003419967,0.002063148,0.8744781,0.0009103693,0.00007243237,0.0007507993,0.01272141,0.04949178,0.01493913,0.0007124491,0.0003648629,0.04315352],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.001524335,0.0001137134,0.969079,0.0004266265,0.00005199202,0.00003342507,0.02573838,0.0004559967,0.0002260884,0.001843756,0.0002902655,0.0002164801],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.997513,0.0004756255,0.0006514117,0.0005018135,0.00007262387,0.0003086308,0.00002616841,0.000004458897,0.0004462831],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9976558,0.001446004,0.0005411745,0.0001006492,0.00002013165,0.000009104711,0.000002096284,0.00001645922,0.0002085994],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.09460085,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6233615,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.01853818347990775,"score_gpt":0.2406765116037782,"score_spread":0.2221383281238705,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}