{"id":"W2347290716","doi":"","title":"Assessment of Forest Fire Danger Rating Systems","year":2006,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"","topic":"Evaluation Methods in Various Fields","field":"Environmental Science","cited_by":9,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Rating system; China; Environmental resource management; National forest; Environmental science; Fire protection; Environmental protection; Forestry; Engineering; Geography; Civil engineering; Environmental economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":["insufficient_payload"],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.000781568,0.00005720055,0.00009088297,0.000009875246,0.00004756272,0.00001444827,0.0001077817,0.00004685144,0.002053358],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00003954294,0.00004718458,0.00002597812,0.000101913,0.00004590127,0.00007385945,0.00007017641,0.00005890378,0.00004630782],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007180929,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.000007393176,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.003329385,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.0003065724,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999093,0.0001051202,0.0002304445,0.0001321542,0.0003337563,0.0001055203],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.999563,0.0001302707,0.00009212128,0.0001869297,0.00000845699,0.00001919981],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[5.108992e-7,0.00005016589,0.8906717,0.00001336621,0.000003365507,9.294843e-7,0.00004118001,0.07961173,0.01143172,0.01056308,0.004964309,0.002647982],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0001630909,0.00004372459,0.7062832,0.00001162736,0.000009620037,0.000002673639,0.00007807965,0.2883795,0.00122637,0.001509398,0.002182587,0.0001101433],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.4762047,0.00001614106,0.1189652,0.00006581236,0.0001434929,0.0001711705,9.671378e-7,0.00002820842,0.4044043],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.8534393,7.93095e-7,0.1423651,0.00003890655,0.00003090784,0.00001411331,0.000002338937,0.000005020737,0.004103454],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.4003009,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.9988589,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.02671936700686329,"score_gpt":0.3413268736459283,"score_spread":0.3146075066390651,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}