{"id":"W2354064325","doi":"","title":"Randomized comparison study on the effectiveness of Hawley and vacuum-formed retainers","year":2011,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Chinese Journal of Aesthetic Medicine","topic":"Occupational health in dentistry","field":"Health Professions","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"CAE (Canada)","funders":"","keywords":"Retainer; Arch; Significant difference; Orthodontics; Medicine; Dentistry; Materials science; Mathematics; Composite material; Structural engineering; Statistics; Engineering","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":false,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.01689608,0.0002091991,0.001394098,0.0002255358,0.0002409656,0.000001822414,0.0002926903,0.00009894982,0.0002234321],"category_scores_gemma":[0.003500733,0.00008757705,0.0001028938,0.0002662999,0.0004385407,0.00006209697,0.00005472312,0.0008857707,0.000009406182],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.00007066377,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.0002162164,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.0001092222,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.00001092543,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9924696,0.004779893,0.001697861,0.0001379993,0.0006801927,0.0002344251],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.990386,0.006983009,0.001561321,0.0003176629,0.0005607796,0.0001911943],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.1768119,0.0009381832,0.7781534,0.0009520702,0.0002158203,0.00006317138,0.03601915,0.000005629433,0.0001106544,0.004812917,0.001260708,0.0006563678],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.1785406,0.003151134,0.7939463,0.003631776,0.0002486632,0.0001217223,0.009084756,0.0001533144,0.00002447944,0.01091147,0.00006434658,0.0001214503],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9913591,0.0004649945,0.0002996716,0.001507857,0.0009257345,0.002271435,0.000001622794,0.000008730603,0.003160901],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9992564,0.00005025478,0.00008672255,0.0002708389,0.0001755456,0.00006132458,0.000001335488,0.00001920715,0.00007832328],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.02693439,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.5855878,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1358093010479965,"score_gpt":0.4740428092244961,"score_spread":0.3382335081764996,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}