{"id":"W2355067036","doi":"10.2310/6650.2005.00005.88","title":"89 SCORE ADJUSTMENTS FOR DIFFERENTIAL ITEM FUNCTIONING IN SCREENING FOR DEMENTIA: CASE OF THE CSHA STUDY","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Journal of Investigative Medicine","topic":"Dementia and Cognitive Impairment Research","field":"Medicine","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"University of Ottawa","funders":"","keywords":"Differential item functioning; Dementia; Psychology; Logistic regression; Cognition; Ordered logit; Psychometrics; Item response theory; Statistics; Clinical psychology; Medicine; Psychiatry; Mathematics","routes":{"ca_aff":true,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":false},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"metacan-v3-hybrid-931329e0061c","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.05611906,0.000715406,0.0007627041,0.003193095,0.001503272,0.001695888,0.002304114,0.001369488,0.002250881],"category_scores_gemma":[0.133406,0.0003837332,0.001882757,0.006116952,0.0009513018,0.001485231,0.002097529,0.001400872,0.0002493376],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.001225291,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.001977171,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.03856632,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.03400643,"domain_scores_codex":[0.9269097,0.05511078,0.005568821,0.003761449,0.006834473,0.001814777],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9267687,0.03891406,0.01352733,0.01334353,0.006162022,0.00128442],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.0003293026,0.000023775,0.9719411,0.00009906713,0.0006976324,0.0005303135,0.000384003,0.0001555576,0.0001003334,0.001755561,0.00300631,0.02097703],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.00009247825,0.0002410629,0.979306,0.0002498471,0.0008944429,0.001531708,0.0006444689,0.004372384,0.0003431305,0.002589521,0.009697917,0.00003712952],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9519973,0.006319837,0.01844013,0.005169294,0.0009427311,0.0007177356,0.00261504,0.0001214261,0.0136765],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.9893945,0.0003457378,0.00748676,0.0008469847,0.000163473,0.0002879918,0.0008962055,0.00003866034,0.0005397499],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.05611906,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.2967895,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.1059282961357331,"score_gpt":0.370122598186756,"score_spread":0.2641943020510229,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}