{"id":"W2355306502","doi":"","title":"A PRELIMINARY DISCUSSION ON PUBLIC PARTICIPATION IN LAND USE PLANING:TAKING JIASHAN COUNTY AS AN EXAMPLE","year":2005,"lang":"en","type":"article","venue":"Economic Geography","topic":"Regional Development and Environment","field":"Social Sciences","cited_by":0,"is_retracted":false,"has_abstract":true,"ca_institutions":"","funders":"","keywords":"Environmental planning; Urbanization; Business; Land use; Government (linguistics); Public participation; Quality (philosophy); China; Land-use planning; Sustainability; Brainstorming; Environmental resource management; Geography; Economic growth; Political science; Marketing; Civil engineering; Public administration; Environmental science; Engineering; Economics","routes":{"ca_aff":false,"ca_fund":false,"ca_venue":false,"about_ca":true,"invisible_to_affiliation_only":true},"retraction":null,"screen":null,"direct_labels":[],"prediction":{"model_version":"codex-gemma-dda1882f352a","candidate_categories":[],"consensus_categories":[],"category_scores_codex":[0.0004691763,0.00009034433,0.00009506512,0.0001753169,0.0002367116,0.0001297608,0.0001229242,0.00006355226,0.0003143005],"category_scores_gemma":[0.00001758821,0.00007433513,0.00003958331,0.00007486876,0.00007390077,0.0006866612,0.00002499068,0.00006923302,0.0001337594],"about_ca_system_candidate":false,"about_ca_system_consensus":false,"about_ca_system_score_codex":0.000150223,"about_ca_system_score_gemma":0.00004310042,"about_ca_topic_candidate":false,"about_ca_topic_consensus":false,"about_ca_topic_score_codex":0.004366181,"about_ca_topic_score_gemma":0.008951468,"domain_scores_codex":[0.999064,0.00008900584,0.0001957261,0.0002488361,0.0001271583,0.0002752358],"domain_scores_gemma":[0.9995913,0.00005892069,0.0001054367,0.00012318,0.000004005208,0.000117181],"domain_codex":null,"domain_gemma":null,"domain_candidate":null,"domain_consensus":null,"study_design_codex":"observational","study_design_gemma":"observational","study_design_scores_codex":[0.00003687323,0.0001106535,0.9813104,0.00000111628,0.000007427178,0.000001308163,0.00510034,0.001221341,0.000002337698,0.003246833,0.0002839222,0.008677447],"study_design_scores_gemma":[0.0002119442,0.00006400698,0.8865273,0.00001272776,0.000002698855,2.17776e-7,0.0005121311,0.0003673201,0.00000537461,0.0006862578,0.1114888,0.0001211979],"study_design_candidate":"observational","study_design_consensus":"observational","genre_codex":"empirical","genre_gemma":"empirical","genre_scores_codex":[0.9919372,0.00001247805,0.000007045293,0.002181799,0.0001153538,0.0001582681,0.000003023227,0.00003176952,0.005553022],"genre_scores_gemma":[0.999061,0.00007858198,0.0001727792,0.0002252673,0.0001470565,0.00003731403,0.00004743015,0.000007765901,0.0002227616],"genre_candidate":"empirical","genre_consensus":"empirical","teacher_disagreement_score":0.1112049,"threshold_uncertainty_score":0.6600389,"prediction_status":"machine_predicted_unvalidated"},"machine_scores":{"provisional":true,"baseline":true,"maturity_gate_passed":false,"score_opus":0.06031912327467866,"score_gpt":0.2859290796710631,"score_spread":0.2256099563963845,"validation_status":"score_only:v0-immature-baseline","note":"Baseline scores from an immature model (maturity gate not passed). Scores rank; they never assert a category."}}